PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VB vs. JPUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VB vs. JPUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) and JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF (JPUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VB achieves a 15.33% return, which is significantly higher than JPUS's 13.90% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VB having a 11.61% annualized return and JPUS not far ahead at 11.80%.


VB

1D
0.70%
1M
5.17%
YTD
15.33%
6M
13.69%
1Y
30.83%
3Y*
16.14%
5Y*
6.98%
10Y*
11.61%

JPUS

1D
0.97%
1M
4.79%
YTD
13.90%
6M
13.51%
1Y
23.69%
3Y*
15.95%
5Y*
9.85%
10Y*
11.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VB vs. JPUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VB
Vanguard Small-Cap ETF
15.33%8.87%14.17%18.22%-17.51%17.57%19.19%27.34%-9.34%16.26%
JPUS
JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF
13.90%11.18%13.48%10.98%-8.47%29.09%7.54%25.50%-6.14%20.58%

Correlation

The correlation between VB and JPUS is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2015

0.86

The correlation between VB and JPUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

VB vs. JPUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VB
JPUS

Industrials

20.8%
10.3%

Technology

17.2%
12.7%

Financial Services

12.6%
7.8%

Consumer Cyclical

11.3%
8.6%

Healthcare

11.1%
11.6%

Real Estate

7.6%
10.5%

Basic Materials

4.8%
7.0%

Energy

4.7%
6.8%

Consumer Defensive

3.4%
11.0%

Utilities

3.3%
9.1%

Communication Services

3.1%
4.6%

Industrials

VB
20.8%
JPUS
10.3%

Technology

VB
17.2%
JPUS
12.7%

Financial Services

VB
12.6%
JPUS
7.8%

Consumer Cyclical

VB
11.3%
JPUS
8.6%

Healthcare

VB
11.1%
JPUS
11.6%

Real Estate

VB
7.6%
JPUS
10.5%

Basic Materials

VB
4.8%
JPUS
7.0%

Energy

VB
4.7%
JPUS
6.8%

Consumer Defensive

VB
3.4%
JPUS
11.0%

Utilities

VB
3.3%
JPUS
9.1%

Communication Services

VB
3.1%
JPUS
4.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VB vs. JPUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VB
VB Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
VB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
VB Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
VB Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
VB Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

JPUS
JPUS Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
JPUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPUS Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
JPUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPUS Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VB vs. JPUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) and JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF (JPUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VBJPUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.37

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.21

3.27

-0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.80

13.15

-1.35

VB vs. JPUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VB Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is comparable to the JPUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VB and JPUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VB vs. JPUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VB drawdown since its inception was -59.56%, which is greater than JPUS's maximum drawdown of -38.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VB and JPUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VBJPUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.56%

-38.69%

-20.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.98%

-6.90%

-2.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.36%

-15.96%

-9.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.15%

-19.04%

-9.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.05%

-38.69%

-3.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.43%

-3.81%

-4.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.44%

1.72%

+0.72%

Volatility

VB vs. JPUS - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) has a higher volatility of 5.41% compared to JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF (JPUS) at 3.12%. This indicates that VB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JPUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VBJPUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.41%

3.12%

+2.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.24%

7.70%

+4.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.68%

10.53%

+6.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.80%

14.52%

+6.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.44%

16.77%

+4.67%

VB vs. JPUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

VB has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than JPUS's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VB vs. JPUS - Dividend Comparison

VB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, less than JPUS's 2.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JPUS
JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF
2.00%2.27%2.12%2.26%2.35%1.67%1.94%2.09%2.16%1.25%0.77%0.48%
VB
Vanguard Small-Cap ETF
1.18%1.33%1.30%1.55%1.59%1.24%1.14%1.39%1.67%1.35%1.50%1.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


VB and JPUS have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VB has higher volatility (5.41%) compared to JPUS (3.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VB dropped -59.56% vs JPUS's -38.69%.

On 10-year performance, JPUS leads with 11.80% vs 11.61% for VB. On fees, VB is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, JPUS has been the lower-risk option at 3.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, JPUS has performed better with a 11.80% return vs 11.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VB is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for JPUS.

JPUS has the higher dividend yield at 2.00%, compared with 1.18% for VB.

VB is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while JPUS is Large Cap Blend Equities. VB tracks CRSP US Small Cap Index, while JPUS tracks JPMorgan Diversified Factor US Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for VB and 0.18% for JPUS.

JPUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VB and JPUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer