VB vs. JPUS
VB (Vanguard Small-Cap ETF) and JPUS (JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VB is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Small Cap Index, while JPUS is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the JPMorgan Diversified Factor US Equity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VB returned 11.61%/yr vs 11.80%/yr for JPUS. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VB charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for JPUS.
Performance
VB vs. JPUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VB achieves a 15.33% return, which is significantly higher than JPUS's 13.90% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VB having a 11.61% annualized return and JPUS not far ahead at 11.80%.
VB
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 5.17%
- YTD
- 15.33%
- 6M
- 13.69%
- 1Y
- 30.83%
- 3Y*
- 16.14%
- 5Y*
- 6.98%
- 10Y*
- 11.61%
JPUS
- 1D
- 0.97%
- 1M
- 4.79%
- YTD
- 13.90%
- 6M
- 13.51%
- 1Y
- 23.69%
- 3Y*
- 15.95%
- 5Y*
- 9.85%
- 10Y*
- 11.80%
VB vs. JPUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VB Vanguard Small-Cap ETF | 15.33% | 8.87% | 14.17% | 18.22% | -17.51% | 17.57% | 19.19% | 27.34% | -9.34% | 16.26% |
JPUS JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF | 13.90% | 11.18% | 13.48% | 10.98% | -8.47% | 29.09% | 7.54% | 25.50% | -6.14% | 20.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between VB and JPUS is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2015 | 0.86 |
The correlation between VB and JPUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
VB vs. JPUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VB
JPUS
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Industrials
VB
JPUS
Technology
VB
JPUS
Financial Services
VB
JPUS
Consumer Cyclical
VB
JPUS
Healthcare
VB
JPUS
Real Estate
VB
JPUS
Basic Materials
VB
JPUS
Energy
VB
JPUS
Consumer Defensive
VB
JPUS
Utilities
VB
JPUS
Communication Services
VB
JPUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VB vs. JPUS — Risk / Return Rank
VB
JPUS
VB vs. JPUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) and JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF (JPUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VB | JPUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.37 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.21 | 3.27 | -0.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.80 | 13.15 | -1.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VB vs. JPUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VB drawdown since its inception was -59.56%, which is greater than JPUS's maximum drawdown of -38.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VB and JPUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VB | JPUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.56% | -38.69% | -20.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.98% | -6.90% | -2.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.36% | -15.96% | -9.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.15% | -19.04% | -9.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.05% | -38.69% | -3.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.43% | -3.81% | -4.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.44% | 1.72% | +0.72% |
Volatility
VB vs. JPUS - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) has a higher volatility of 5.41% compared to JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF (JPUS) at 3.12%. This indicates that VB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JPUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VB | JPUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.41% | 3.12% | +2.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.24% | 7.70% | +4.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.68% | 10.53% | +6.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.80% | 14.52% | +6.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.44% | 16.77% | +4.67% |
VB vs. JPUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
VB has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than JPUS's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VB vs. JPUS - Dividend Comparison
VB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, less than JPUS's 2.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JPUS JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF | 2.00% | 2.27% | 2.12% | 2.26% | 2.35% | 1.67% | 1.94% | 2.09% | 2.16% | 1.25% | 0.77% | 0.48% |
VB Vanguard Small-Cap ETF | 1.18% | 1.33% | 1.30% | 1.55% | 1.59% | 1.24% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.67% | 1.35% | 1.50% | 1.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VB and JPUS have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VB has higher volatility (5.41%) compared to JPUS (3.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VB dropped -59.56% vs JPUS's -38.69%.
On 10-year performance, JPUS leads with 11.80% vs 11.61% for VB. On fees, VB is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, JPUS has been the lower-risk option at 3.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, JPUS has performed better with a 11.80% return vs 11.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VB is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for JPUS.
JPUS has the higher dividend yield at 2.00%, compared with 1.18% for VB.
VB is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while JPUS is Large Cap Blend Equities. VB tracks CRSP US Small Cap Index, while JPUS tracks JPMorgan Diversified Factor US Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for VB and 0.18% for JPUS.
JPUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VB and JPUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer