VB vs. IWC
VB (Vanguard Small-Cap ETF) and IWC (iShares Micro-Cap ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds - VB tracks the CRSP US Small Cap Index while IWC tracks the Russell Microcap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VB returned 11.38%/yr vs 11.58%/yr for IWC. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VB charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for IWC.
Performance
VB vs. IWC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VB achieves a 14.91% return, which is significantly lower than IWC's 21.51% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VB having a 11.38% annualized return and IWC not far ahead at 11.58%.
VB
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- 3.68%
- YTD
- 14.91%
- 6M
- 16.03%
- 1Y
- 31.39%
- 3Y*
- 17.31%
- 5Y*
- 7.35%
- 10Y*
- 11.38%
IWC
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 5.14%
- YTD
- 21.51%
- 6M
- 25.02%
- 1Y
- 61.79%
- 3Y*
- 22.59%
- 5Y*
- 5.97%
- 10Y*
- 11.58%
VB vs. IWC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VB Vanguard Small-Cap ETF | 14.91% | 8.87% | 14.17% | 18.22% | -17.51% | 17.57% | 19.19% | 27.34% | -9.34% | 16.26% |
IWC iShares Micro-Cap ETF | 21.51% | 22.45% | 13.63% | 8.99% | -21.93% | 18.67% | 20.88% | 22.20% | -13.13% | 12.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between VB and IWC is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 17, 2005 | 0.93 |
The correlation between VB and IWC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
VB vs. IWC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VB
IWC
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Industrials
VB
IWC
Technology
VB
IWC
Financial Services
VB
IWC
Consumer Cyclical
VB
IWC
Healthcare
VB
IWC
Real Estate
VB
IWC
Basic Materials
VB
IWC
Energy
VB
IWC
Consumer Defensive
VB
IWC
Utilities
VB
IWC
Communication Services
VB
IWC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VB vs. IWC — Risk / Return Rank
VB
IWC
VB vs. IWC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) and iShares Micro-Cap ETF (IWC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VB | IWC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.94 | 2.64 | -0.70 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.75 | 3.41 | -0.65 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.41 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.48 | 4.97 | -1.49 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.82 | 16.48 | -3.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VB | IWC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.94 | 2.64 | -0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | 0.25 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | 0.48 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.32 | +0.12 |
Drawdowns
VB vs. IWC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VB drawdown since its inception was -59.56%, smaller than the maximum IWC drawdown of -64.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VB and IWC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VB | IWC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.56% | -64.61% | +5.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.98% | -12.43% | +3.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.36% | -29.46% | +4.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.15% | -40.68% | +12.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.05% | -47.21% | +5.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.83% | +0.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.44% | -15.28% | +6.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.43% | 3.75% | -1.32% |
Volatility
VB vs. IWC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) is 4.40%, while iShares Micro-Cap ETF (IWC) has a volatility of 6.90%. This indicates that VB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VB | IWC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.40% | 6.90% | -2.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.73% | 17.20% | -5.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.27% | 23.52% | -7.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.75% | 24.40% | -3.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.43% | 24.42% | -2.99% |
VB vs. IWC - Expense Ratio Comparison
VB has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than IWC's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
VB vs. IWC - Dividend Comparison
VB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, more than IWC's 0.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWC iShares Micro-Cap ETF | 0.89% | 1.10% | 1.06% | 1.17% | 1.18% | 0.78% | 0.98% | 1.19% | 1.01% | 1.09% | 1.16% | 1.49% |
VB Vanguard Small-Cap ETF | 1.19% | 1.33% | 1.30% | 1.55% | 1.59% | 1.24% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.67% | 1.35% | 1.50% | 1.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VB and IWC have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IWC has higher volatility (6.90%) compared to VB (4.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VB dropped -59.56% vs IWC's -64.61%.
On 10-year performance, IWC leads with 11.58% vs 11.38% for VB. On fees, VB is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, VB has been the lower-risk option at 4.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IWC has performed better with a 11.58% return vs 11.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VB is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for IWC.
VB has the higher dividend yield at 1.19%, compared with 0.89% for IWC.
VB tracks CRSP US Small Cap Index, while IWC tracks Russell Microcap Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for VB and 0.60% for IWC.
IWC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VB and IWC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer