PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
IWC vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

IWC vs. VOO

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

IWC (iShares Micro-Cap ETF) and VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IWC is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell Microcap Index, while VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IWC returned 12.07%/yr vs 15.77%/yr for VOO. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IWC charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VOO.

Performance

IWC vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Micro-Cap ETF (IWC) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWC achieves a 23.36% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 9.75% return. Over the past 10 years, IWC has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 12.07%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.77% annualized return.

IWC

1D
0.82%
1M
4.00%
YTD
23.36%
6M
19.51%
1Y
59.41%
3Y*
23.10%
5Y*
6.01%
10Y*
12.07%

VOO

1D
-0.29%
1M
0.08%
YTD
9.75%
6M
9.30%
1Y
26.77%
3Y*
21.36%
5Y*
13.58%
10Y*
15.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWC vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IWC
iShares Micro-Cap ETF		23.36%22.45%13.63%8.99%-21.93%18.67%20.88%22.20%-13.13%12.79%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF		9.75%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between IWC and VOO is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010

0.77

The correlation between IWC and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

IWC vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
IWC
VOO

Healthcare

26.8%
8.3%

Technology

21.7%
39.1%

Financial Services

17.6%
10.9%

Industrials

13.3%
7.6%

Consumer Cyclical

5.2%
9.8%

Basic Materials

4.1%
1.7%

Energy

4.0%
3.2%

Real Estate

3.3%
1.8%

Communication Services

1.9%
10.5%

Consumer Defensive

1.6%
4.5%

Utilities

0.5%
2.5%

Healthcare

IWC
26.8%
VOO
8.3%

Technology

IWC
21.7%
VOO
39.1%

Financial Services

IWC
17.6%
VOO
10.9%

Industrials

IWC
13.3%
VOO
7.6%

Consumer Cyclical

IWC
5.2%
VOO
9.8%

Basic Materials

IWC
4.1%
VOO
1.7%

Energy

IWC
4.0%
VOO
3.2%

Real Estate

IWC
3.3%
VOO
1.8%

Communication Services

IWC
1.9%
VOO
10.5%

Consumer Defensive

IWC
1.6%
VOO
4.5%

Utilities

IWC
0.5%
VOO
2.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Micro-Cap ETF

Vanguard S&P 500 ETF

Often compared with IWC:
IWC vs. IWMIWC vs. FDMIWC vs. SPYIWC vs. IWXIWC vs. PVIVXIWC vs. VTIWC vs. VO
Often compared with VOO:
VOO vs. VTIVOO vs. QQQVOO vs. SCHDVOO vs. VTVOO vs. SPYVOO vs. FXAIXVOO vs. VGT

Return for Risk

IWC vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
IWC
IWC Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
IWC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWC Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
IWC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWC Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWC vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Micro-Cap ETF (IWC) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

IWCVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.45
2.17

+0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.14
2.93

+0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.39

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.80

3.02

+1.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.64

13.58

+2.06

IWC vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWC Sharpe Ratio is 2.45, which is comparable to the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWC and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IWC vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWC drawdown since its inception was -64.61%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWC and VOO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

IWCVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.61%

-33.99%

-30.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.43%

-8.90%

-3.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.46%

-18.69%

-10.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.61%

-24.52%

-16.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.21%

-33.99%

-13.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.74%

+1.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.25%

-3.68%

-11.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.81%

1.98%

+1.83%

Volatility

IWC vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

iShares Micro-Cap ETF (IWC) has a higher volatility of 8.66% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 4.60%. This indicates that IWC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

IWCVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.66%

4.60%

+4.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.16%

9.73%

+8.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.39%

12.39%

+12.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.58%

16.90%

+7.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.52%

18.05%

+6.47%

IWC vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWC has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

IWC vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

IWC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, less than VOO's 1.04% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IWC
iShares Micro-Cap ETF		0.98%1.10%1.06%1.17%1.18%0.78%0.98%1.19%1.01%1.09%1.16%1.49%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF		1.04%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions

IWC and VOO have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IWC has higher volatility (8.66%) compared to VOO (4.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWC dropped -64.61% vs VOO's -33.99%.

On 10-year performance, VOO leads with 15.77% vs 12.07% for IWC. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 4.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VOO has performed better with a 15.77% return vs 12.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for IWC.

VOO has the higher dividend yield at 1.04%, compared with 0.98% for IWC.

IWC is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. IWC tracks Russell Microcap Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for IWC and 0.03% for VOO.

IWC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IWC and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer