VB vs. FNDE
VB (Vanguard Small-Cap ETF) and FNDE (Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VB is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Small Cap Index, while FNDE is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity Emerging Markets Index (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VB returned 11.61%/yr vs 11.35%/yr for FNDE. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VB charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for FNDE.
Performance
VB vs. FNDE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VB achieves a 15.33% return, which is significantly higher than FNDE's 13.70% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VB having a 11.61% annualized return and FNDE not far behind at 11.35%.
VB
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 5.17%
- YTD
- 15.33%
- 6M
- 13.69%
- 1Y
- 30.83%
- 3Y*
- 16.14%
- 5Y*
- 6.98%
- 10Y*
- 11.61%
FNDE
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- 2.02%
- YTD
- 13.70%
- 6M
- 15.79%
- 1Y
- 31.37%
- 3Y*
- 19.78%
- 5Y*
- 9.29%
- 10Y*
- 11.35%
VB vs. FNDE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VB Vanguard Small-Cap ETF | 15.33% | 8.87% | 14.17% | 18.22% | -17.51% | 17.57% | 19.19% | 27.34% | -9.34% | 16.26% |
FNDE Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 13.70% | 29.46% | 12.10% | 14.99% | -15.58% | 14.41% | -2.77% | 19.75% | -10.37% | 26.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between VB and FNDE is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2013 | 0.61 |
The correlation between VB and FNDE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.
VB vs. FNDE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VB
FNDE
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Industrials
VB
FNDE
Technology
VB
FNDE
Financial Services
VB
FNDE
Consumer Cyclical
VB
FNDE
Healthcare
VB
FNDE
Real Estate
VB
FNDE
Basic Materials
VB
FNDE
Energy
VB
FNDE
Consumer Defensive
VB
FNDE
Utilities
VB
FNDE
Communication Services
VB
FNDE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VB vs. FNDE — Risk / Return Rank
VB
FNDE
VB vs. FNDE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) and Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF (FNDE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VB | FNDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.35 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.21 | 2.93 | +0.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.80 | 10.67 | +1.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VB vs. FNDE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VB drawdown since its inception was -59.56%, which is greater than FNDE's maximum drawdown of -43.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VB and FNDE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VB | FNDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.56% | -43.55% | -16.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.98% | -10.23% | +1.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.36% | -18.40% | -6.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.15% | -29.44% | +1.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.05% | -39.93% | -2.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -3.19% | +3.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.43% | -11.69% | +3.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.44% | 2.80% | -0.36% |
Volatility
VB vs. FNDE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) is 5.41%, while Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF (FNDE) has a volatility of 6.30%. This indicates that VB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNDE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VB | FNDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.41% | 6.30% | -0.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.24% | 13.07% | -0.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.68% | 15.61% | +1.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.80% | 17.01% | +3.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.44% | 19.30% | +2.14% |
VB vs. FNDE - Expense Ratio Comparison
VB has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than FNDE's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
VB vs. FNDE - Dividend Comparison
VB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, less than FNDE's 3.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNDE Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 3.68% | 4.19% | 4.82% | 4.74% | 5.59% | 4.32% | 2.50% | 3.47% | 2.98% | 2.05% | 1.65% | 2.02% |
VB Vanguard Small-Cap ETF | 1.18% | 1.33% | 1.30% | 1.55% | 1.59% | 1.24% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.67% | 1.35% | 1.50% | 1.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VB and FNDE have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FNDE has higher volatility (6.30%) compared to VB (5.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VB dropped -59.56% vs FNDE's -43.55%.
On 10-year performance, VB leads with 11.61% vs 11.35% for FNDE. On fees, VB is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, VB has been the lower-risk option at 5.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VB has performed better with a 11.61% return vs 11.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VB is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for FNDE.
FNDE has the higher dividend yield at 3.68%, compared with 1.18% for VB.
VB is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while FNDE is Emerging Markets Equities. VB tracks CRSP US Small Cap Index, while FNDE tracks RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity Emerging Markets Index (Net). They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for VB and 0.39% for FNDE.
FNDE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VB and FNDE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer