PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VB vs. BBSC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VB vs. BBSC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (BBSC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VB achieves a 14.91% return, which is significantly lower than BBSC's 17.06% return.


VB

1D
0.75%
1M
3.68%
YTD
14.91%
6M
16.03%
1Y
31.39%
3Y*
17.31%
5Y*
7.35%
10Y*
11.38%

BBSC

1D
0.40%
1M
3.20%
YTD
17.06%
6M
17.43%
1Y
39.74%
3Y*
17.78%
5Y*
6.98%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VB vs. BBSC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
VB
Vanguard Small-Cap ETF
14.91%8.87%14.17%18.22%-17.51%17.57%8.90%
BBSC
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF
17.06%10.38%12.31%20.07%-19.75%15.44%11.94%

Correlation

The correlation between VB and BBSC is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2020

0.98

The correlation between VB and BBSC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

VB vs. BBSC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VB
BBSC

Industrials

20.8%
14.9%

Technology

17.2%
18.5%

Financial Services

12.6%
16.9%

Consumer Cyclical

11.3%
9.0%

Healthcare

11.1%
15.7%

Real Estate

7.6%
7.7%

Basic Materials

4.8%
4.1%

Energy

4.7%
6.4%

Consumer Defensive

3.4%
3.2%

Utilities

3.3%
1.2%

Communication Services

3.1%
2.4%

Industrials

VB
20.8%
BBSC
14.9%

Technology

VB
17.2%
BBSC
18.5%

Financial Services

VB
12.6%
BBSC
16.9%

Consumer Cyclical

VB
11.3%
BBSC
9.0%

Healthcare

VB
11.1%
BBSC
15.7%

Real Estate

VB
7.6%
BBSC
7.7%

Basic Materials

VB
4.8%
BBSC
4.1%

Energy

VB
4.7%
BBSC
6.4%

Consumer Defensive

VB
3.4%
BBSC
3.2%

Utilities

VB
3.3%
BBSC
1.2%

Communication Services

VB
3.1%
BBSC
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VB vs. BBSC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VB
VB Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
VB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
VB Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
VB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
VB Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

BBSC
BBSC Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
BBSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBSC Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
BBSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBSC Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VB vs. BBSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (BBSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VBBBSCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.94

2.09

-0.15

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.75

2.94

-0.19

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.35

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.48

4.18

-0.71

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.82

13.66

-0.84

VB vs. BBSC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VB Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is comparable to the BBSC Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VB and BBSC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VBBBSCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.94

2.09

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

0.31

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.50

-0.05

Drawdowns

VB vs. BBSC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VB drawdown since its inception was -59.56%, which is greater than BBSC's maximum drawdown of -30.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VB and BBSC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VBBBSCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.56%

-30.96%

-28.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.98%

-9.54%

+0.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.36%

-29.32%

+3.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.15%

-30.96%

+2.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.37%

+0.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.44%

-11.50%

+3.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.43%

2.92%

-0.49%

Volatility

VB vs. BBSC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) is 4.40%, while JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (BBSC) has a volatility of 4.81%. This indicates that VB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BBSC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VBBBSCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.40%

4.81%

-0.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.73%

12.98%

-1.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.27%

19.07%

-2.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.75%

22.92%

-2.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.43%

22.86%

-1.43%

VB vs. BBSC - Expense Ratio Comparison

VB has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than BBSC's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VB vs. BBSC - Dividend Comparison

VB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, more than BBSC's 1.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBSC
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF
1.02%1.13%1.29%1.58%1.37%1.06%0.18%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VB
Vanguard Small-Cap ETF
1.19%1.33%1.30%1.55%1.59%1.24%1.14%1.39%1.67%1.35%1.50%1.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, VB and BBSC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BBSC has higher volatility (4.81%) compared to VB (4.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VB dropped -59.56% vs BBSC's -30.96%.

On 5-year performance, VB leads with 7.35% vs 6.98% for BBSC. On fees, VB is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, VB has been the lower-risk option at 4.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VB has performed better with a 7.35% return vs 6.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VB is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for BBSC.

VB has the higher dividend yield at 1.19%, compared with 1.02% for BBSC.

VB tracks CRSP US Small Cap Index, while BBSC tracks Morningstar US Small Cap Target Market Exposure Extended Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for VB and 0.09% for BBSC.

BBSC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VB and BBSC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer