VAW vs. VIS

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard Materials ETF (VAW) and Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS).

VAW and VIS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. VAW is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the MSCI US Investable Market Materials 25/50 Index. It was launched on Jan 26, 2004. VIS is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the MSCI US Investable Market Industrials 25/50 Index. It was launched on Sep 23, 2004. Both VAW and VIS are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

VAW vs. VIS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Materials ETF (VAW) and Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

VAW vs. VIS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VAW Vanguard Materials ETF	8.97%	12.30%	0.48%	13.67%	-11.80%	27.43%	19.44%	23.53%	-17.49%	23.76%
VIS Vanguard Industrials ETF	4.90%	18.57%	16.85%	22.50%	-8.57%	20.80%	12.34%	30.09%	-14.01%	21.47%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VAW achieves a 8.97% return, which is significantly higher than VIS's 4.90% return. Over the past 10 years, VAW has underperformed VIS with an annualized return of 10.55%, while VIS has yielded a comparatively higher 13.16% annualized return.

VAW

• 1D: 2.34%
• 1M: -7.36%
• YTD: 8.97%
• 6M: 10.84%
• 1Y: 21.22%
• 3Y*: 10.04%
• 5Y*: 7.09%
• 10Y*: 10.55%

VIS

• 1D: 3.42%
• 1M: -8.44%
• YTD: 4.90%
• 6M: 5.93%
• 1Y: 27.43%
• 3Y*: 19.38%
• 5Y*: 11.84%
• 10Y*: 13.16%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VAW vs. VIS - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both VAW and VIS have an expense ratio of 0.10%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

VAW

Vanguard Materials ETF

VIS

Vanguard Industrials ETF

Return for Risk

VAW vs. VIS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VAW

VAW Risk / Return Rank: 60
VAW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
VAW Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
VAW Omega Ratio Rank: 55
VAW Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
VAW Martin Ratio Rank: 59

VIS

VIS Risk / Return Rank: 79
VIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
VIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
VIS Omega Ratio Rank: 75
VIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
VIS Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VAW vs. VIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Materials ETF (VAW) and Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VAW	VIS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.00	1.35	-0.35
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.51	1.95	-0.44
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.27	-0.07
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.56	2.23	-0.67
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.38	8.80	-3.42
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VAW vs. VIS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VAW Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is comparable to the VIS Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VAW and VIS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VAW	VIS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.00	1.35	-0.35
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.36	0.65	-0.29
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.50	0.65	-0.15
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.39	0.50	-0.11

Correlation

The correlation between VAW and VIS is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

VAW vs. VIS - Dividend Comparison

VAW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.41%, more than VIS's 0.97% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
VAW Vanguard Materials ETF	1.41%	1.55%	1.70%	1.72%	1.98%	1.44%	1.67%	1.94%	2.03%	1.63%	1.67%	2.30%
VIS Vanguard Industrials ETF	0.97%	1.01%	1.23%	1.36%	1.52%	1.11%	1.38%	1.68%	1.90%	1.60%	1.81%	1.94%

Drawdowns

VAW vs. VIS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VAW drawdown since its inception was -62.17%, roughly equal to the maximum VIS drawdown of -63.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VAW and VIS.

Drawdown Indicators

	VAW	VIS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-62.17%	-63.51%	+1.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.33%	-12.63%	-1.70%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.50%	-22.96%	-2.54%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.13%	-42.42%	+1.29%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.36%	-9.29%	+1.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.67%	-8.42%	-1.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.15%	3.20%	+0.95%

Volatility

VAW vs. VIS - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Materials ETF (VAW) and Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS) have volatilities of 7.07% and 7.06%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VAW	VIS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.07%	7.06%	+0.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.34%	12.65%	+0.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.39%	20.47%	+0.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.56%	18.18%	+1.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.14%	20.33%	+0.81%