PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VAVX vs. NLR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VAVX vs. NLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Avalanche ETF (VAVX) and VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


VAVX

1D
1.25%
1M
-31.09%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NLR

1D
-1.73%
1M
-6.46%
YTD
-1.45%
6M
-4.74%
1Y
15.99%
3Y*
31.54%
5Y*
21.03%
10Y*
12.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VAVX vs. NLR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between VAVX and NLR is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2026

0.49

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VAVX vs. NLR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VAVX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


NLR
NLR Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
NLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
NLR Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
NLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
NLR Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VAVX vs. NLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Avalanche ETF (VAVX) and VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VAVXNLRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.16

VAVX vs. NLR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VAVX vs. NLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VAVX drawdown since its inception was -47.52%, smaller than the maximum NLR drawdown of -65.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VAVX and NLR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VAVXNLRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.52%

-65.05%

+17.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-46.86%

-25.53%

-21.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.46%

-35.68%

+11.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.83%

Volatility

VAVX vs. NLR - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VAVXNLRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

66.49%

42.81%

+23.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

66.49%

29.63%

+36.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

66.49%

24.26%

+42.23%

VAVX vs. NLR - Expense Ratio Comparison

VAVX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than NLR's 0.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

VAVX vs. NLR - Dividend Comparison

VAVX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NLR
VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF
2.59%2.55%0.76%4.54%2.02%1.99%2.23%2.21%3.91%4.86%3.62%3.30%
VAVX
VanEck Avalanche ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VAVX and NLR have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VAVX is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VAVX is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for NLR.

NLR has the higher dividend yield at 2.59%, compared with 0.00% for VAVX.

VAVX is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while NLR is Uranium. VAVX tracks MarketVector Avalanche Benchmark Rate, while NLR tracks MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for VAVX and 0.56% for NLR.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VAVX and NLR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer