PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VAS.AX vs. QQQM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VAS.AX vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a A$10,000 investment in Vanguard Australian Shares Index ETF (VAS.AX) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VAS.AX is traded in AUD, while QQQM is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the QQQM values have been converted to AUD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VAS.AX achieves a 1.86% return, which is significantly lower than QQQM's 12.18% return.


VAS.AX

1D
0.13%
1M
-0.77%
6M
1.35%
YTD
1.86%
1Y
4.90%
3Y*
9.38%
5Y*
6.75%
10Y*
8.30%

QQQM

1D
0.00%
1M
-1.96%
6M
11.38%
YTD
12.18%
1Y
21.13%
3Y*
23.72%
5Y*
17.12%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VAS.AX vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
VAS.AX
Vanguard Australian Shares Index ETF
1.86%10.66%9.60%11.05%-2.40%17.39%8.06%
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
11.81%12.08%38.33%55.13%-28.06%34.92%-0.77%

Correlation

The correlation between VAS.AX and QQQM is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2020

0.03

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VAS.AX vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VAS.AX
VAS.AX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
VAS.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VAS.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
VAS.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
VAS.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
VAS.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQM
QQQM Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
QQQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQM Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQM Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VAS.AX vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Australian Shares Index ETF (VAS.AX) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VAS.AXQQQMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.25

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.65

1.37

-0.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.54

3.63

-2.09

VAS.AX vs. QQQM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VAS.AX Sharpe Ratio is 0.46, which is lower than the QQQM Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VAS.AX and QQQM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VAS.AX vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VAS.AX drawdown since its inception was -35.75%, which is greater than QQQM's maximum drawdown of -30.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VAS.AX and QQQM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VAS.AXQQQMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.75%

-30.93%

-4.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.56%

-15.50%

+6.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.23%

-20.51%

+7.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.18%

-30.93%

+15.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.89%

-3.16%

+0.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.80%

-7.14%

+2.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.68%

5.84%

-2.16%

Volatility

VAS.AX vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Australian Shares Index ETF (VAS.AX) is 2.37%, while Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) has a volatility of 6.69%. This indicates that VAS.AX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VAS.AXQQQMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.37%

6.69%

-4.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.05%

12.56%

-2.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.14%

15.53%

-3.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.76%

19.85%

-7.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.39%

19.65%

-5.26%

VAS.AX vs. QQQM - Expense Ratio Comparison

VAS.AX has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQM's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VAS.AX vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison

VAS.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.22%, more than QQQM's 0.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
0.44%0.50%0.61%0.65%0.83%0.40%0.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VAS.AX
Vanguard Australian Shares Index ETF
2.22%3.17%1.68%2.92%6.39%3.30%2.56%4.12%3.90%2.57%2.82%3.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


VAS.AX and QQQM have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VAS.AX is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VAS.AX is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for QQQM.

VAS.AX is categorized as Australia Equities, while QQQM is Nasdaq-100. VAS.AX tracks S&P/ASX 300 Index, while QQQM tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for VAS.AX and 0.15% for QQQM.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VAS.AX and QQQM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer