PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VAS.AX vs. A200.AX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VAS.AX vs. A200.AX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a A$10,000 investment in Vanguard Australian Shares Index ETF (VAS.AX) and Betashares Australia 200 ETF (A200.AX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VAS.AX achieves a 2.04% return, which is significantly lower than A200.AX's 2.57% return.


VAS.AX

1D
0.75%
1M
1.53%
YTD
2.04%
6M
3.80%
1Y
7.34%
3Y*
10.91%
5Y*
7.62%
10Y*
9.18%

A200.AX

1D
0.77%
1M
1.45%
YTD
2.57%
6M
4.30%
1Y
7.42%
3Y*
11.10%
5Y*
7.95%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VAS.AX vs. A200.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
VAS.AX
Vanguard Australian Shares Index ETF
2.04%10.66%11.40%12.00%-1.68%17.04%1.90%23.77%-4.67%
A200.AX
Betashares Australia 200 ETF
2.57%10.31%11.57%12.00%-0.56%17.90%1.16%22.87%-3.83%

Correlation

The correlation between VAS.AX and A200.AX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2018

0.98

The correlation between VAS.AX and A200.AX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VAS.AX vs. A200.AX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VAS.AX
VAS.AX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
VAS.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VAS.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
VAS.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
VAS.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
VAS.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

A200.AX
A200.AX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
A200.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
A200.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
A200.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
A200.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
A200.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VAS.AX vs. A200.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Australian Shares Index ETF (VAS.AX) and Betashares Australia 200 ETF (A200.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VAS.AXA200.AXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.12

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.85

0.88

-0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.21

2.26

-0.05

VAS.AX vs. A200.AX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VAS.AX Sharpe Ratio is 0.62, which is comparable to the A200.AX Sharpe Ratio of 0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VAS.AX and A200.AX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VAS.AXA200.AXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

0.63

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.63

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.58

+0.02

Drawdowns

VAS.AX vs. A200.AX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VAS.AX drawdown since its inception was -35.75%, roughly equal to the maximum A200.AX drawdown of -35.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VAS.AX and A200.AX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VAS.AXA200.AXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.75%

-35.55%

-0.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.56%

-8.40%

-0.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.23%

-13.22%

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.18%

-14.79%

-0.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.45%

-3.36%

-0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.70%

-4.21%

-0.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.31%

3.28%

+0.03%

Volatility

VAS.AX vs. A200.AX - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Australian Shares Index ETF (VAS.AX) and Betashares Australia 200 ETF (A200.AX) have volatilities of 4.29% and 4.17%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VAS.AXA200.AXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.29%

4.17%

+0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.61%

9.51%

+0.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.82%

11.79%

+0.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.77%

12.65%

+0.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.45%

15.29%

-0.84%

VAS.AX vs. A200.AX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VAS.AX has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than A200.AX's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VAS.AX vs. A200.AX - Dividend Comparison

VAS.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.12%, less than A200.AX's 3.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
A200.AX
Betashares Australia 200 ETF
3.35%3.33%3.13%3.75%6.35%2.98%2.54%3.61%1.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VAS.AX
Vanguard Australian Shares Index ETF
3.12%3.17%3.22%3.71%7.19%3.01%2.56%4.12%4.84%3.76%4.14%4.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, VAS.AX and A200.AX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, A200.AX is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

A200.AX is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for VAS.AX.

VAS.AX tracks S&P/ASX 300 Index, while A200.AX tracks Solactive Australia 200 Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and BetaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for VAS.AX and 0.04% for A200.AX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VAS.AX and A200.AX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer