VAMO vs. QQHG

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Cambria Value and Momentum ETF (VAMO) and Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF (QQHG).

VAMO and QQHG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. VAMO is an actively managed fund by Cambria. It was launched on Sep 8, 2015. QQHG is an actively managed fund by Invesco. It was launched on May 5, 2025.

Performance

VAMO vs. QQHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cambria Value and Momentum ETF (VAMO) and Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF (QQHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

VAMO vs. QQHG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
VAMO Cambria Value and Momentum ETF	3.84%	16.38%
QQHG Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF	-1.76%	20.59%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VAMO achieves a 3.84% return, which is significantly higher than QQHG's -1.76% return.

VAMO

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: 0.18%
• YTD: 3.84%
• 6M: 6.46%
• 1Y: 22.03%
• 3Y*: 13.40%
• 5Y*: 9.57%
• 10Y*: 5.47%

QQHG

• 1D: 0.79%
• 1M: -2.23%
• YTD: -1.76%
• 6M: 0.14%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VAMO vs. QQHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

VAMO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than QQHG's 0.45% expense ratio.

VAMO

Cambria Value and Momentum ETF

QQHG

Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF

Return for Risk

VAMO vs. QQHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VAMO

VAMO Risk / Return Rank: 90
VAMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
VAMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
VAMO Omega Ratio Rank: 84
VAMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
VAMO Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VAMO vs. QQHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Value and Momentum ETF (VAMO) and Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF (QQHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VAMO	QQHG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.94	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.80	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.00	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	13.00	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VAMO	QQHG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.94	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.54	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.30	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.25	2.17	-1.92

Correlation

The correlation between VAMO and QQHG is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

VAMO vs. QQHG - Dividend Comparison

VAMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, more than QQHG's 0.23% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
VAMO Cambria Value and Momentum ETF	0.63%	1.41%	0.84%	1.35%	1.10%	1.07%	1.03%	1.15%	1.03%	0.35%	0.56%	0.20%
QQHG Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF	0.23%	0.17%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

VAMO vs. QQHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VAMO drawdown since its inception was -41.84%, which is greater than QQHG's maximum drawdown of -6.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VAMO and QQHG.

Drawdown Indicators

	VAMO	QQHG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.84%	-6.18%	-35.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.55%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.25%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.84%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.11%	-3.64%	+1.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.10%	-1.06%	-9.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.71%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	VAMO	QQHG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.97%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.76%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.39%	9.60%	+1.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.89%	9.60%	+8.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.08%	9.60%	+8.48%