VALT.TO vs. CCCX.TO
VALT.TO (CI Gold Bullion ETF) and CCCX.TO (CI Galaxy Core Multi-Crypto ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VALT.TO is a Gold fund tracking the No Index (Physical Commodity), while CCCX.TO is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by CI Global Asset Management. VALT.TO is passively managed, while CCCX.TO is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. VALT.TO charges 0.17%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for CCCX.TO.
Performance
VALT.TO vs. CCCX.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VALT.TO achieves a -6.93% return, which is significantly higher than CCCX.TO's -31.77% return.
VALT.TO
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 1.59%
- 6M
- -19.64%
- YTD
- -6.93%
- 1Y
- 17.76%
- 3Y*
- 25.22%
- 5Y*
- 16.17%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 13.95%
CCCX.TO
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- 8.53%
- 6M
- -30.24%
- YTD
- -31.77%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA$484.00 | CA$315.52 | CA$5.52K | |
VALT.TO CI Gold Bullion ETF | CA$185.75K | CA$223.40K | CA$363.49K |
VALT.TO vs. CCCX.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
VALT.TO CI Gold Bullion ETF | -6.93% | 25.99% |
CCCX.TO CI Galaxy Core Multi-Crypto ETF | -31.77% | -25.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between VALT.TO and CCCX.TO is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2025 | -0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VALT.TO vs. CCCX.TO — Risk / Return Rank
VALT.TO
CCCX.TO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
VALT.TO vs. CCCX.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Gold Bullion ETF (VALT.TO) and CI Galaxy Core Multi-Crypto ETF (CCCX.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VALT.TO | CCCX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.66 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.48 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VALT.TO vs. CCCX.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VALT.TO drawdown since its inception was -27.07%, smaller than the maximum CCCX.TO drawdown of -58.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VALT.TO and CCCX.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VALT.TO | CCCX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.07% | -58.93% | +31.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.07% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.07% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.75% | -53.38% | +27.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.25% | -36.18% | +29.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.03% | — | — |
Volatility
VALT.TO vs. CCCX.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VALT.TO | CCCX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.20% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.23% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.23% | 52.24% | -24.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.62% | 52.24% | -33.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.21% | 52.24% | -34.03% |
VALT.TO vs. CCCX.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
VALT.TO has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than CCCX.TO's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
VALT.TO vs. CCCX.TO - Dividend Comparison
Neither VALT.TO nor CCCX.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
VALT.TO and CCCX.TO have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VALT.TO is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VALT.TO is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for CCCX.TO.
VALT.TO is categorized as Gold, while CCCX.TO is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for VALT.TO and 0.50% for CCCX.TO.
Find the right allocation for VALT.TO and CCCX.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer