CCCX.TO vs. BTCC-U.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about CI Galaxy Core Multi-Crypto ETF (CCCX.TO) and Purpose Bitcoin ETF Non-Currency Hedged Units (BTCC-U.TO).

CCCX.TO and BTCC-U.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CCCX.TO is an actively managed fund by CI Global Asset Management. It was launched on Aug 22, 2025. BTCC-U.TO is an actively managed fund by Purpose Investments. It was launched on Nov 9, 2021.

Performance

CCCX.TO vs. BTCC-U.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CI Galaxy Core Multi-Crypto ETF (CCCX.TO) and Purpose Bitcoin ETF Non-Currency Hedged Units (BTCC-U.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CCCX.TO vs. BTCC-U.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CCCX.TO CI Galaxy Core Multi-Crypto ETF	-29.85%	-25.28%
BTCC-U.TO Purpose Bitcoin ETF Non-Currency Hedged Units	-21.78%	-22.41%

Different Trading Currencies

CCCX.TO is traded in CAD, while BTCC-U.TO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BTCC-U.TO values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCCX.TO achieves a -29.85% return, which is significantly lower than BTCC-U.TO's -21.78% return.

CCCX.TO

• 1D: 0.79%
• 1M: -1.54%
• YTD: -29.85%
• 6M: -47.04%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BTCC-U.TO

• 1D: 1.24%
• 1M: 5.05%
• YTD: -21.78%
• 6M: -40.80%
• 1Y: -21.87%
• 3Y*: 32.79%
• 5Y*: 3.36%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCCX.TO vs. BTCC-U.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CCCX.TO

CI Galaxy Core Multi-Crypto ETF

Return for Risk

CCCX.TO vs. BTCC-U.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTCC-U.TO

BTCC-U.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5
BTCC-U.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
BTCC-U.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
BTCC-U.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6
BTCC-U.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
BTCC-U.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCCX.TO vs. BTCC-U.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Galaxy Core Multi-Crypto ETF (CCCX.TO) and Purpose Bitcoin ETF Non-Currency Hedged Units (BTCC-U.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CCCX.TO	BTCC-U.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	-0.49	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.06	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-1.17	0.10	-1.27

Correlation

The correlation between CCCX.TO and BTCC-U.TO is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CCCX.TO vs. BTCC-U.TO - Dividend Comparison

Neither CCCX.TO nor BTCC-U.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

CCCX.TO vs. BTCC-U.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCCX.TO drawdown since its inception was -54.70%, smaller than the maximum BTCC-U.TO drawdown of -75.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCCX.TO and BTCC-U.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	CCCX.TO	BTCC-U.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.70%	-76.91%	+22.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-49.37%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-76.91%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-52.07%	-46.42%	-5.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-28.62%	-33.74%	+5.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	23.17%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CCCX.TO	BTCC-U.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	13.06%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	36.43%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	57.34%	44.45%	+12.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	57.34%	55.05%	+2.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	57.34%	55.25%	+2.09%