VALT.TO vs. FBTC

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about CI Gold Bullion Fund (VALT.TO) and Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Trust (FBTC).

VALT.TO and FBTC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FBTC is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. It was launched on Jan 11, 2024.

Performance

VALT.TO vs. FBTC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CI Gold Bullion Fund (VALT.TO) and Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Trust (FBTC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

VALT.TO vs. FBTC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
VALT.TO CI Gold Bullion Fund	8.41%	60.46%	28.11%
FBTC Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Trust	-21.52%	-10.84%	114.27%

Different Trading Currencies

VALT.TO is traded in CAD, while FBTC is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FBTC values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VALT.TO achieves a 8.41% return, which is significantly higher than FBTC's -21.52% return.

VALT.TO

• 1D: 4.34%
• 1M: -11.14%
• YTD: 8.41%
• 6M: 20.41%
• 1Y: 46.70%
• 3Y*: 31.47%
• 5Y*: 20.74%
• 10Y*: —

FBTC

• 1D: 1.86%
• 1M: 5.33%
• YTD: -21.52%
• 6M: -40.91%
• 1Y: -20.71%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VALT.TO vs. FBTC - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBTC

Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Trust

Return for Risk

VALT.TO vs. FBTC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VALT.TO

VALT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 83
VALT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
VALT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
VALT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 81
VALT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
VALT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 84

FBTC

FBTC Risk / Return Rank: 6
FBTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
FBTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
FBTC Omega Ratio Rank: 6
FBTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
FBTC Martin Ratio Rank: 6

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VALT.TO vs. FBTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Gold Bullion Fund (VALT.TO) and Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Trust (FBTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VALT.TO	FBTC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.67	-0.46	+2.14
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.11	-0.41	+2.52
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	0.95	+0.35
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.51	-0.43	+2.94
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.19	-0.92	+10.11
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VALT.TO vs. FBTC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VALT.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is higher than the FBTC Sharpe Ratio of -0.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VALT.TO and FBTC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VALT.TO	FBTC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.67	-0.46	+2.14
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.17	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.03	0.40	+0.63

Correlation

The correlation between VALT.TO and FBTC is 0.09, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

VALT.TO vs. FBTC - Dividend Comparison

Neither VALT.TO nor FBTC has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

VALT.TO vs. FBTC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VALT.TO drawdown since its inception was -20.96%, smaller than the maximum FBTC drawdown of -50.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VALT.TO and FBTC.

Drawdown Indicators

	VALT.TO	FBTC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.96%	-49.33%	+28.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.47%	-49.33%	+29.86%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.96%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.51%	-46.06%	+32.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.49%	-14.12%	+8.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.31%	23.05%	-17.74%

Volatility

VALT.TO vs. FBTC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CI Gold Bullion Fund (VALT.TO) is 11.12%, while Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Trust (FBTC) has a volatility of 12.88%. This indicates that VALT.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBTC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VALT.TO	FBTC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.12%	12.88%	-1.76%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.22%	36.37%	-12.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.08%	44.73%	-16.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.87%	50.57%	-32.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.77%	50.57%	-32.80%