VALT.TO vs. CGL.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about CI Gold Bullion Fund (VALT.TO) and iShares Gold Bullion ETF (CAD-Hedged) (CGL.TO).
VALT.TO and CGL.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CGL.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Gold Bullion. It was launched on May 28, 2009.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: VALT.TO or CGL.TO.
Correlation
The correlation between VALT.TO and CGL.TO is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
VALT.TO vs. CGL.TO - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
VALT.TO:
1.91
CGL.TO:
1.84
VALT.TO:
2.50
CGL.TO:
2.45
VALT.TO:
1.34
CGL.TO:
1.33
VALT.TO:
3.46
CGL.TO:
3.41
VALT.TO:
9.83
CGL.TO:
9.41
VALT.TO:
2.88%
CGL.TO:
2.96%
VALT.TO:
14.82%
CGL.TO:
15.12%
VALT.TO:
-20.96%
CGL.TO:
-45.96%
VALT.TO:
-5.58%
CGL.TO:
-5.69%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VALT.TO achieves a 0.55% return, which is significantly lower than CGL.TO's 0.63% return.
VALT.TO
0.55%
-0.67%
9.64%
27.71%
N/A
N/A
CGL.TO
0.63%
-0.52%
9.61%
27.57%
9.97%
6.82%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
VALT.TO vs. CGL.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
Risk-Adjusted Performance
VALT.TO vs. CGL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Gold Bullion Fund (VALT.TO) and iShares Gold Bullion ETF (CAD-Hedged) (CGL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
VALT.TO vs. CGL.TO - Dividend Comparison
Neither VALT.TO nor CGL.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
VALT.TO vs. CGL.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VALT.TO drawdown since its inception was -20.96%, smaller than the maximum CGL.TO drawdown of -45.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VALT.TO and CGL.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
VALT.TO vs. CGL.TO - Volatility Comparison
CI Gold Bullion Fund (VALT.TO) and iShares Gold Bullion ETF (CAD-Hedged) (CGL.TO) have volatilities of 5.02% and 5.10%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.