VALQ vs. FDG
VALQ (American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Value ETF) and FDG (American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VALQ is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the iSTOXX American Century USA Quality Value Index, while FDG is a Global Equities fund actively managed by American Century. VALQ is passively managed, while FDG is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, VALQ returned 8.69%/yr vs 12.61%/yr for FDG. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VALQ charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for FDG.
Performance
VALQ vs. FDG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VALQ achieves a 5.49% return, which is significantly lower than FDG's 7.52% return.
VALQ
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 5.64%
- YTD
- 5.49%
- 6M
- 6.17%
- 1Y
- 16.17%
- 3Y*
- 15.35%
- 5Y*
- 8.69%
- 10Y*
- —
FDG
- 1D
- -2.00%
- 1M
- 3.68%
- YTD
- 7.52%
- 6M
- 9.17%
- 1Y
- 31.12%
- 3Y*
- 29.27%
- 5Y*
- 12.61%
- 10Y*
- —
VALQ vs. FDG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VALQ American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Value ETF | 5.49% | 10.58% | 16.71% | 13.87% | -7.73% | 27.05% | 43.19% |
FDG American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF | 7.52% | 22.13% | 45.89% | 37.22% | -35.74% | 8.52% | 93.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between VALQ and FDG is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2020 | 0.61 |
The correlation between VALQ and FDG shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (1 year) to 0.65 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VALQ vs. FDG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VALQ
FDG
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
-
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Energy
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
VALQ
FDG
Healthcare
VALQ
FDG
Consumer Defensive
VALQ
FDG
-
Industrials
VALQ
FDG
Consumer Cyclical
VALQ
FDG
Communication Services
VALQ
FDG
Energy
VALQ
FDG
Financial Services
VALQ
FDG
Basic Materials
VALQ
FDG
-
Real Estate
VALQ
FDG
-
Utilities
VALQ
-
FDG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VALQ vs. FDG — Risk / Return Rank
VALQ
FDG
VALQ vs. FDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Value ETF (VALQ) and American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF (FDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VALQ | FDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.30 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.07 | 1.99 | +0.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.87 | 7.02 | -1.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VALQ | FDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.46 | 1.76 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 | 0.51 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.92 | -0.42 |
Drawdowns
VALQ vs. FDG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VALQ drawdown since its inception was -38.19%, smaller than the maximum FDG drawdown of -43.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VALQ and FDG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VALQ | FDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.19% | -43.69% | +5.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.85% | -15.71% | +7.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.62% | -26.14% | +10.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.19% | -43.69% | +23.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.38% | -3.13% | +2.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.95% | -13.43% | +8.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.76% | 4.45% | -1.69% |
Volatility
VALQ vs. FDG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Value ETF (VALQ) is 2.45%, while American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF (FDG) has a volatility of 5.18%. This indicates that VALQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VALQ | FDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.45% | 5.18% | -2.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.97% | 14.03% | -6.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.13% | 17.77% | -6.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.48% | 24.67% | -10.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.66% | 24.90% | -7.24% |
VALQ vs. FDG - Expense Ratio Comparison
VALQ has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than FDG's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
VALQ vs. FDG - Dividend Comparison
VALQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%, while FDG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDG American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VALQ American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Value ETF | 1.73% | 1.88% | 1.58% | 1.76% | 2.71% | 1.58% | 2.08% | 2.31% | 2.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VALQ and FDG have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FDG has higher volatility (5.18%) compared to VALQ (2.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VALQ dropped -38.19% vs FDG's -43.69%.
On 5-year performance, FDG leads with 12.61% vs 8.69% for VALQ. On fees, VALQ is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, VALQ has been the lower-risk option at 2.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FDG has performed better with a 12.61% return vs 8.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VALQ is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FDG.
VALQ has the higher dividend yield at 1.73%, compared with 0.00% for FDG.
VALQ is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while FDG is Global Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for VALQ and 0.45% for FDG.
FDG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VALQ and FDG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer