PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VADAX vs. MLPAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VADAX vs. MLPAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Equally-Weighted S&P 500 Fund Class A (VADAX) and Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Fund Class A (MLPAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VADAX achieves a 12.90% return, which is significantly lower than MLPAX's 22.49% return. Over the past 10 years, VADAX has outperformed MLPAX with an annualized return of 11.45%, while MLPAX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.09% annualized return.


VADAX

1D
-0.18%
1M
-0.05%
6M
8.68%
YTD
12.90%
1Y
19.95%
3Y*
13.16%
5Y*
8.48%
10Y*
11.45%
ALL TIME*
9.18%

MLPAX

1D
0.71%
1M
4.13%
6M
16.62%
YTD
22.49%
1Y
24.08%
3Y*
24.17%
5Y*
23.73%
10Y*
9.09%
ALL TIME*
7.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

VADAX vs. MLPAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VADAX
Invesco Equally-Weighted S&P 500 Fund Class A
12.90%10.89%12.40%13.29%-12.07%28.93%12.30%28.59%-8.19%18.26%
MLPAX
Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Fund Class A
22.49%4.31%40.77%20.43%29.07%39.45%-30.58%5.60%-15.05%-7.22%

Correlation

The correlation between VADAX and MLPAX is 0.11, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.51

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2010

0.53

Over the past year, the correlation between VADAX and MLPAX has dropped to 0.11 - well below their long-term average of 0.53, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VADAX vs. MLPAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VADAX
VADAX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
VADAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VADAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
VADAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
VADAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
VADAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

MLPAX
MLPAX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
MLPAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLPAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLPAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
MLPAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLPAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VADAX vs. MLPAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Equally-Weighted S&P 500 Fund Class A (VADAX) and Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Fund Class A (MLPAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VADAXMLPAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.34

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.38

3.91

-1.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.20

9.71

-0.50

VADAX vs. MLPAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VADAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is comparable to the MLPAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VADAX and MLPAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VADAX vs. MLPAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VADAX drawdown since its inception was -60.27%, smaller than the maximum MLPAX drawdown of -77.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VADAX and MLPAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VADAXMLPAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.27%

-77.51%

+17.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.89%

-5.92%

-1.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.92%

-15.29%

-2.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.74%

-21.04%

-0.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.32%

-72.85%

+33.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.24%

-0.80%

-0.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.06%

-16.91%

+9.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.05%

2.44%

-0.39%

Volatility

VADAX vs. MLPAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Equally-Weighted S&P 500 Fund Class A (VADAX) is 2.88%, while Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Fund Class A (MLPAX) has a volatility of 3.85%. This indicates that VADAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MLPAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VADAXMLPAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.88%

3.85%

-0.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.56%

9.26%

-0.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.76%

11.72%

+0.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.24%

19.01%

-2.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.45%

25.96%

-7.51%

VADAX vs. MLPAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VADAX has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is lower than MLPAX's 1.54% expense ratio.


Dividends

VADAX vs. MLPAX - Dividend Comparison

VADAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.04%, more than MLPAX's 5.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MLPAX
Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Fund Class A
5.10%5.72%5.00%5.91%6.56%7.91%14.02%9.91%10.40%8.21%7.34%7.99%
VADAX
Invesco Equally-Weighted S&P 500 Fund Class A
9.04%10.21%8.77%4.69%8.49%9.80%6.21%4.49%6.90%2.76%0.30%2.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


VADAX and MLPAX have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MLPAX has higher volatility (3.85%) compared to VADAX (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VADAX dropped -60.27% vs MLPAX's -77.51%.

MLPAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VADAX and MLPAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer