V3AM.L vs. SSLN.L
V3AM.L (Vanguard ESG Global All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Distributing) and SSLN.L (iShares Physical Silver ETC) are both exchange-traded funds - V3AM.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, while SSLN.L is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, V3AM.L returned 11.49%/yr vs 22.99%/yr for SSLN.L. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. V3AM.L charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for SSLN.L.
Performance
V3AM.L vs. SSLN.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
V3AM.L is traded in GBP, while SSLN.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SSLN.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, V3AM.L achieves a 12.15% return, which is significantly higher than SSLN.L's 3.18% return.
V3AM.L
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 4.56%
- YTD
- 12.15%
- 6M
- 12.06%
- 1Y
- 30.04%
- 3Y*
- 17.82%
- 5Y*
- 11.49%
- 10Y*
- —
SSLN.L
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- 1.18%
- YTD
- 3.18%
- 6M
- 28.32%
- 1Y
- 115.93%
- 3Y*
- 42.31%
- 5Y*
- 22.99%
- 10Y*
- 16.71%
V3AM.L vs. SSLN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
V3AM.L Vanguard ESG Global All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Distributing | 12.15% | 12.40% | 19.59% | 18.06% | -13.39% | 17.05% |
SSLN.L iShares Physical Silver ETC | 3.18% | 130.26% | 23.21% | -6.20% | 15.75% | -4.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between V3AM.L and SSLN.L is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2021 | 0.14 |
The correlation between V3AM.L and SSLN.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (5 years) to 0.25 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
V3AM.L vs. SSLN.L — Risk / Return Rank
V3AM.L
SSLN.L
V3AM.L vs. SSLN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard ESG Global All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Distributing (V3AM.L) and iShares Physical Silver ETC (SSLN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| V3AM.L | SSLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.37 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.73 | 2.98 | +0.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.11 | 6.53 | +8.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| V3AM.L | SSLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.67 | 2.11 | +0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 | 0.70 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.89 | 0.17 | +0.72 |
Drawdowns
V3AM.L vs. SSLN.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum V3AM.L drawdown since its inception was -19.25%, smaller than the maximum SSLN.L drawdown of -69.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for V3AM.L and SSLN.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| V3AM.L | SSLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.25% | -69.95% | +50.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.18% | -38.72% | +30.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.25% | -38.72% | +19.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.25% | -38.72% | +19.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.57% | -33.62% | +33.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.85% | -45.32% | +40.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.02% | 17.69% | -15.67% |
Volatility
V3AM.L vs. SSLN.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard ESG Global All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Distributing (V3AM.L) is 3.51%, while iShares Physical Silver ETC (SSLN.L) has a volatility of 16.31%. This indicates that V3AM.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SSLN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| V3AM.L | SSLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.51% | 16.31% | -12.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.67% | 51.81% | -43.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.41% | 54.53% | -43.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.65% | 33.31% | -19.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.59% | 29.69% | -16.10% |
V3AM.L vs. SSLN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
V3AM.L has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is higher than SSLN.L's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
V3AM.L vs. SSLN.L - Dividend Comparison
V3AM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, while SSLN.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSLN.L iShares Physical Silver ETC | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
V3AM.L Vanguard ESG Global All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Distributing | 1.09% | 1.23% | 1.28% | 1.45% | 1.70% | 0.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
V3AM.L and SSLN.L have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SSLN.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SSLN.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for V3AM.L.
V3AM.L is categorized as Global Equities, while SSLN.L is Silver. V3AM.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while SSLN.L tracks LBMA Silver Price. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for V3AM.L and 0.20% for SSLN.L.
Find the right allocation for V3AM.L and SSLN.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer