PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
V vs. SCHW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

V vs. SCHW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Visa Inc. (V) and The Charles Schwab Corporation (SCHW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, V achieves a -7.29% return, which is significantly higher than SCHW's -8.33% return. Over the past 10 years, V has outperformed SCHW with an annualized return of 16.26%, while SCHW has yielded a comparatively lower 13.79% annualized return.


V

1D
0.44%
1M
-0.59%
YTD
-7.29%
6M
-6.26%
1Y
-7.50%
3Y*
13.11%
5Y*
7.92%
10Y*
16.26%

SCHW

1D
-0.16%
1M
0.08%
YTD
-8.33%
6M
-3.88%
1Y
5.43%
3Y*
20.37%
5Y*
5.67%
10Y*
13.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

V vs. SCHW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
V
Visa Inc.
-7.29%11.76%22.32%26.31%-3.40%-0.31%17.12%43.33%16.49%47.18%
SCHW
The Charles Schwab Corporation
-8.33%36.65%9.17%-15.97%0.11%60.23%13.57%16.38%-18.43%31.15%

Correlation

The correlation between V and SCHW is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2008

0.45

The correlation between V and SCHW shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (3 years) to 0.45 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

V:

$15.24

SCHW:

$5.26

PE Ratio

V:

21.25

SCHW:

17.28

PEG Ratio

V:

1.30

SCHW:

0.99

PS Ratio

V:

10.98

SCHW:

6.74

Total Revenue (TTM)

V:

$43.03B

SCHW:

$24.17B

Gross Profit (TTM)

V:

$16.94B

SCHW:

$18.86B

EBITDA (TTM)

V:

$27.63B

SCHW:

$13.11B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

V vs. SCHW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

V
V Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
V Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
V Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
V Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
V Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
V Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHW
SCHW Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
SCHW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHW Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHW Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHW Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHW Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

V vs. SCHW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Visa Inc. (V) and The Charles Schwab Corporation (SCHW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VSCHWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

1.06

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.44

0.27

-0.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.94

0.64

-1.57

V vs. SCHW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current V Sharpe Ratio is -0.35, which is lower than the SCHW Sharpe Ratio of 0.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of V and SCHW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

V vs. SCHW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum V drawdown since its inception was -51.90%, smaller than the maximum SCHW drawdown of -86.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for V and SCHW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VSCHWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.90%

-86.79%

+34.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.18%

-19.83%

+2.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.38%

-27.11%

+6.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.60%

-49.70%

+21.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.36%

-51.08%

+14.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.57%

-14.57%

+2.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.27%

-35.53%

+27.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.01%

8.55%

-0.54%

Volatility

V vs. SCHW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Visa Inc. (V) is 5.54%, while The Charles Schwab Corporation (SCHW) has a volatility of 7.42%. This indicates that V experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VSCHWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.54%

7.42%

-1.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.52%

19.74%

-3.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.83%

24.19%

-2.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.82%

32.21%

-9.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.46%

33.42%

-8.96%

Dividends

V vs. SCHW - Dividend Comparison

V's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, less than SCHW's 1.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHW
The Charles Schwab Corporation
1.30%1.08%1.35%1.45%1.01%0.86%1.36%1.43%1.11%0.62%0.68%0.73%
V
Visa Inc.
0.80%0.70%0.68%0.72%0.76%0.62%0.56%0.56%0.67%0.61%0.75%0.64%

Financials

V vs. SCHW - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Visa Inc. and The Charles Schwab Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00B20222023202420252026
11.23B
3.14B
(V) Total Revenue
(SCHW) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

V vs. SCHW - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Visa Inc. and The Charles Schwab Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-50.0%0.0%50.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
-79.3%
32.7%
Portfolio components
V - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Visa Inc. reported a gross profit of -8.90B and revenue of 11.23B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -79.3%.

SCHW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Charles Schwab Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.03B and revenue of 3.14B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.7%.

V - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Visa Inc. reported an operating income of 7.23B and revenue of 11.23B, resulting in an operating margin of 64.4%.

SCHW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Charles Schwab Corporation reported an operating income of -730.00M and revenue of 3.14B, resulting in an operating margin of -23.2%.

V - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Visa Inc. reported a net income of 6.02B and revenue of 11.23B, resulting in a net margin of 53.6%.

SCHW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Charles Schwab Corporation reported a net income of 2.48B and revenue of 3.14B, resulting in a net margin of 78.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


V and SCHW have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHW has higher volatility (7.42%) compared to V (5.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, V dropped -51.90% vs SCHW's -86.79%.

SCHW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.23 vs -0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for V and SCHW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer