PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
V vs. LDOS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

V vs. LDOS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Visa Inc. (V) and Leidos Holdings, Inc. (LDOS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, V achieves a -7.69% return, which is significantly higher than LDOS's -32.12% return. Over the past 10 years, V has outperformed LDOS with an annualized return of 15.98%, while LDOS has yielded a comparatively lower 14.97% annualized return.


V

1D
1.05%
1M
0.65%
YTD
-7.69%
6M
-6.93%
1Y
-12.51%
3Y*
13.87%
5Y*
7.33%
10Y*
15.98%

LDOS

1D
0.07%
1M
-1.62%
YTD
-32.12%
6M
-35.31%
1Y
-16.67%
3Y*
14.74%
5Y*
4.03%
10Y*
14.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

V vs. LDOS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
V
Visa Inc.
-7.69%11.76%22.32%26.31%-3.40%-0.31%17.12%43.33%16.49%47.18%
LDOS
Leidos Holdings, Inc.
-32.12%26.50%34.52%4.50%20.04%-14.20%8.95%88.82%-16.72%29.14%

Correlation

The correlation between V and LDOS is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2008

0.38

The correlation between V and LDOS shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (1 year) to 0.38 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

V:

$15.24

LDOS:

$10.92

PE Ratio

V:

21.16

LDOS:

11.19

PEG Ratio

V:

1.30

LDOS:

0.09

PS Ratio

V:

10.93

LDOS:

0.92

Total Revenue (TTM)

V:

$43.03B

LDOS:

$17.33B

Gross Profit (TTM)

V:

$16.94B

LDOS:

$3.04B

EBITDA (TTM)

V:

$27.63B

LDOS:

$2.34B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

V vs. LDOS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

V
V Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
V Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
V Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
V Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
V Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
V Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

LDOS
LDOS Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
LDOS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LDOS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
LDOS Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
LDOS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
LDOS Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

V vs. LDOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Visa Inc. (V) and Leidos Holdings, Inc. (LDOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VLDOSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.92

0.91

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.73

-0.43

-0.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.57

-1.09

-0.48

V vs. LDOS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current V Sharpe Ratio is -0.56, which is comparable to the LDOS Sharpe Ratio of -0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of V and LDOS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

V vs. LDOS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum V drawdown since its inception was -51.90%, smaller than the maximum LDOS drawdown of -54.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for V and LDOS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VLDOSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.90%

-54.72%

+2.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.18%

-38.73%

+21.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.38%

-38.73%

+18.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.60%

-38.73%

+10.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.36%

-42.29%

+5.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.96%

-38.49%

+25.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.26%

-19.68%

+11.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.73%

15.33%

-4.60%

Volatility

V vs. LDOS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Visa Inc. (V) is 5.57%, while Leidos Holdings, Inc. (LDOS) has a volatility of 6.30%. This indicates that V experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LDOS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VLDOSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.57%

6.30%

-0.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.57%

25.00%

-7.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.35%

29.28%

-6.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.82%

26.73%

-3.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.45%

27.48%

-3.03%

Dividends

V vs. LDOS - Dividend Comparison

V's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, less than LDOS's 1.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LDOS
Leidos Holdings, Inc.
1.36%0.90%1.07%1.35%1.37%1.57%1.29%1.35%2.43%1.98%29.17%3.41%
V
Visa Inc.
0.81%0.70%0.68%0.72%0.76%0.62%0.56%0.56%0.67%0.61%0.75%0.64%

Financials

V vs. LDOS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Visa Inc. and Leidos Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00B20222023202420252026
11.23B
4.40B
(V) Total Revenue
(LDOS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

V vs. LDOS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Visa Inc. and Leidos Holdings, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-50.0%0.0%50.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
-79.3%
17.3%
Portfolio components
V - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Visa Inc. reported a gross profit of -8.90B and revenue of 11.23B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -79.3%.

LDOS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Leidos Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 761.00M and revenue of 4.40B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 17.3%.

V - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Visa Inc. reported an operating income of 7.23B and revenue of 11.23B, resulting in an operating margin of 64.4%.

LDOS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Leidos Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 508.00M and revenue of 4.40B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.6%.

V - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Visa Inc. reported a net income of 6.02B and revenue of 11.23B, resulting in a net margin of 53.6%.

LDOS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Leidos Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 328.00M and revenue of 4.40B, resulting in a net margin of 7.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


V and LDOS have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LDOS has higher volatility (6.30%) compared to V (5.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, V dropped -51.90% vs LDOS's -54.72%.

V currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.56 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for V and LDOS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer