V vs. FNMA
V (Visa Inc.) and FNMA (Federal National Mortgage Association) are both stocks. Both are in the Financial Services sector — V in Credit Services, FNMA in Mortgage Finance. Over the past 10 years, V returned 15.98%/yr vs 12.27%/yr for FNMA. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
V vs. FNMA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, V achieves a -7.69% return, which is significantly higher than FNMA's -39.52% return. Over the past 10 years, V has outperformed FNMA with an annualized return of 15.98%, while FNMA has yielded a comparatively lower 12.27% annualized return.
V
- 1D
- 1.05%
- 1M
- -1.03%
- YTD
- -7.69%
- 6M
- -6.93%
- 1Y
- -7.91%
- 3Y*
- 13.87%
- 5Y*
- 7.33%
- 10Y*
- 15.98%
FNMA
- 1D
- 2.72%
- 1M
- -16.90%
- YTD
- -39.52%
- 6M
- -39.35%
- 1Y
- -32.56%
- 3Y*
- 145.80%
- 5Y*
- 22.01%
- 10Y*
- 12.27%
V vs. FNMA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
V Visa Inc. | -7.69% | 11.76% | 22.32% | 26.31% | -3.40% | -0.31% | 17.12% | 43.33% | 16.49% | 47.18% |
FNMA Federal National Mortgage Association | -39.52% | 227.13% | 206.54% | 202.77% | -56.90% | -65.69% | -23.40% | 194.34% | -60.00% | -32.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between V and FNMA is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2008 | 0.21 |
The correlation between V and FNMA shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (1 year) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
V:
$15.24
FNMA:
$2.77
V:
21.16
FNMA:
2.34
V:
1.30
FNMA:
0.00
V:
10.93
FNMA:
0.24
V:
$43.03B
FNMA:
$161.03B
V:
$16.94B
FNMA:
$117.99B
V:
$27.63B
FNMA:
$111.39B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
V vs. FNMA — Risk / Return Rank
V
FNMA
V vs. FNMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Visa Inc. (V) and Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| V | FNMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.00 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.73 | -0.49 | -0.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.57 | -0.91 | -0.66 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
V vs. FNMA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum V drawdown since its inception was -51.90%, smaller than the maximum FNMA drawdown of -99.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for V and FNMA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| V | FNMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.90% | -99.74% | +47.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.18% | -69.76% | +52.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.38% | -69.76% | +49.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.60% | -84.50% | +55.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.36% | -92.13% | +55.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.96% | -91.14% | +78.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.26% | -46.18% | +37.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.73% | 37.56% | -26.83% |
Volatility
V vs. FNMA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Visa Inc. (V) is 5.57%, while Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA) has a volatility of 18.31%. This indicates that V experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNMA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| V | FNMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.57% | 18.31% | -12.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.57% | 66.11% | -48.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.35% | 93.38% | -71.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.82% | 91.93% | -69.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.45% | 81.90% | -57.45% |
Dividends
V vs. FNMA - Dividend Comparison
V's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, while FNMA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNMA Federal National Mortgage Association | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
V Visa Inc. | 0.81% | 0.70% | 0.68% | 0.72% | 0.76% | 0.62% | 0.56% | 0.56% | 0.67% | 0.61% | 0.75% | 0.64% |
Financials
V vs. FNMA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Visa Inc. and Federal National Mortgage Association. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
V vs. FNMA - Profitability Comparison
V - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Visa Inc. reported a gross profit of -8.90B and revenue of 11.23B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -79.3%.
FNMA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Federal National Mortgage Association reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 40.22B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
V - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Visa Inc. reported an operating income of 7.23B and revenue of 11.23B, resulting in an operating margin of 64.4%.
FNMA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Federal National Mortgage Association reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 40.22B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
V - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Visa Inc. reported a net income of 6.02B and revenue of 11.23B, resulting in a net margin of 53.6%.
FNMA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Federal National Mortgage Association reported a net income of 5.61B and revenue of 40.22B, resulting in a net margin of 13.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
V and FNMA have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FNMA has higher volatility (18.31%) compared to V (5.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, V dropped -51.90% vs FNMA's -99.74%.
FNMA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.37 vs -0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for V and FNMA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer