PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UYM vs. XDSQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

UYM vs. XDSQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Basic Materials (UYM) and Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

UYM vs. XDSQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
UYM
ProShares Ultra Basic Materials
21.88%9.46%-8.00%17.47%-23.10%24.87%
XDSQ
Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF
-4.22%14.22%23.12%23.00%-16.78%12.75%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UYM achieves a 21.88% return, which is significantly higher than XDSQ's -4.22% return.


UYM

1D
2.07%
1M
-10.24%
YTD
21.88%
6M
26.46%
1Y
28.20%
3Y*
9.93%
5Y*
6.72%
10Y*
12.79%

XDSQ

1D
0.71%
1M
-5.75%
YTD
-4.22%
6M
-0.33%
1Y
14.44%
3Y*
14.44%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


UYM vs. XDSQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

UYM has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than XDSQ's 0.79% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

UYM vs. XDSQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UYM
UYM Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
UYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
UYM Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
UYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
UYM Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

XDSQ
XDSQ Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
XDSQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDSQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDSQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
XDSQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDSQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UYM vs. XDSQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Basic Materials (UYM) and Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UYMXDSQDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.67

0.81

-0.13

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.20

1.27

-0.07

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.21

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.04

1.21

-0.16

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.22

5.87

-2.65

UYM vs. XDSQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UYM Sharpe Ratio is 0.67, which is comparable to the XDSQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UYM and XDSQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UYMXDSQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

0.81

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.08

0.61

-0.52

Correlation

The correlation between UYM and XDSQ is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

UYM vs. XDSQ - Dividend Comparison

UYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, while XDSQ has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
UYM
ProShares Ultra Basic Materials
1.24%1.47%0.98%0.28%0.88%0.52%0.56%1.24%0.94%0.38%0.55%0.42%
XDSQ
Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

UYM vs. XDSQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UYM drawdown since its inception was -92.77%, which is greater than XDSQ's maximum drawdown of -26.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UYM and XDSQ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


UYMXDSQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.77%

-26.06%

-66.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.11%

-12.18%

-15.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-73.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.72%

-6.46%

-5.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-42.41%

-5.08%

-37.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.12%

2.50%

+6.62%

Volatility

UYM vs. XDSQ - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra Basic Materials (UYM) has a higher volatility of 11.88% compared to Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ) at 5.68%. This indicates that UYM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDSQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


UYMXDSQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.88%

5.68%

+6.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.01%

9.63%

+15.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.04%

17.99%

+24.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.32%

15.32%

+24.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.73%

15.32%

+27.41%