PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UYM vs. UCC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UYM vs. UCC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Basic Materials (UYM) and ProShares Ultra Consumer Services (UCC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UYM achieves a 27.95% return, which is significantly higher than UCC's -8.62% return. Over the past 10 years, UYM has underperformed UCC with an annualized return of 12.48%, while UCC has yielded a comparatively higher 13.99% annualized return.


UYM

1D
3.74%
1M
1.10%
YTD
27.95%
6M
30.38%
1Y
36.06%
3Y*
11.85%
5Y*
4.60%
10Y*
12.48%

UCC

1D
0.57%
1M
-4.37%
YTD
-8.62%
6M
-10.29%
1Y
12.48%
3Y*
14.37%
5Y*
-0.24%
10Y*
13.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UYM vs. UCC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UYM
ProShares Ultra Basic Materials
27.95%9.46%-8.00%17.47%-23.10%54.58%16.56%35.09%-35.68%51.51%
UCC
ProShares Ultra Consumer Services
-8.62%2.21%44.24%61.67%-57.59%20.92%46.55%53.76%-4.94%42.05%

Correlation

The correlation between UYM and UCC is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2007

0.59

The correlation between UYM and UCC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UYM vs. UCC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UYM
UYM Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
UYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
UYM Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
UYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
UYM Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

UCC
UCC Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
UCC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UCC Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
UCC Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
UCC Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
UCC Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UYM vs. UCC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Basic Materials (UYM) and ProShares Ultra Consumer Services (UCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UYMUCCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.08

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.38

0.35

+1.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.67

0.97

+2.70

UYM vs. UCC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UYM Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is higher than the UCC Sharpe Ratio of 0.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UYM and UCC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UYM vs. UCC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UYM drawdown since its inception was -92.77%, which is greater than UCC's maximum drawdown of -83.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UYM and UCC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UYMUCCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.77%

-83.05%

-9.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.85%

-29.14%

+5.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-43.88%

-48.01%

+4.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.25%

-61.77%

+13.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-73.31%

-61.77%

-11.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.32%

-18.41%

+11.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-42.06%

-21.80%

-20.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.95%

10.45%

-1.50%

Volatility

UYM vs. UCC - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra Basic Materials (UYM) has a higher volatility of 14.01% compared to ProShares Ultra Consumer Services (UCC) at 12.41%. This indicates that UYM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UCC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UYMUCCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.01%

12.41%

+1.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.29%

27.05%

+0.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.09%

36.41%

-1.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.49%

43.70%

-4.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.86%

40.68%

+2.18%

UYM vs. UCC - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both UYM and UCC have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Dividends

UYM vs. UCC - Dividend Comparison

UYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, which matches UCC's 1.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
UCC
ProShares Ultra Consumer Services
1.18%1.10%0.17%0.04%0.25%0.00%0.02%0.17%0.18%0.14%0.21%0.14%
UYM
ProShares Ultra Basic Materials
1.19%1.47%0.98%0.28%0.88%0.52%0.56%1.24%0.94%0.38%0.55%0.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


UYM and UCC have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UYM has higher volatility (14.01%) compared to UCC (12.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UYM dropped -92.77% vs UCC's -83.05%.

On 10-year performance, UCC leads with 13.99% vs 12.48% for UYM. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, UCC has been the lower-risk option at 12.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, UCC has performed better with a 13.99% return vs 12.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

UYM and UCC have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

UYM has the higher dividend yield at 1.19%, compared with 1.18% for UCC.

UYM tracks Dow Jones U.S. Basic Materials Index (200%), while UCC tracks Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Services Index (200%).

UYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.94 vs 0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UYM and UCC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer