UYM vs. BITU

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

UYM (ProShares Ultra Basic Materials) and BITU (Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UYM is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Basic Materials Index (200%), while BITU is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Bitcoin Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, UYM returned 34.35% vs -73.07% for BITU. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.

Performance

UYM vs. BITU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Basic Materials (UYM) and Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UYM achieves a 25.08% return, which is significantly higher than BITU's -52.92% return.

UYM

• 1D: 2.40%
• 1M: -0.29%
• YTD: 25.08%
• 6M: 32.48%
• 1Y: 34.35%
• 3Y*: 13.32%
• 5Y*: 3.40%
• 10Y*: 11.85%

BITU

• 1D: -5.58%
• 1M: -34.84%
• YTD: -52.92%
• 6M: -59.11%
• 1Y: -73.07%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UYM vs. BITU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
UYM ProShares Ultra Basic Materials	25.08%	9.46%	-19.91%
BITU Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF	-52.92%	-37.07%	37.90%

Correlation

The correlation between UYM and BITU is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.26
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2024	0.25

UYM vs. BITU - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	UYM	BITU
Basic Materials	87.6%	-
Consumer Cyclical	12.4%	-
Industrials	1.1%	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	4.2%
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

UYM vs. BITU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UYM

UYM Risk / Return Rank: 28
UYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
UYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
UYM Omega Ratio Rank: 27
UYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
UYM Martin Ratio Rank: 28

BITU

BITU Risk / Return Rank: 2
BITU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
BITU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
BITU Omega Ratio Rank: 2
BITU Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
BITU Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UYM vs. BITU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Basic Materials (UYM) and Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	UYM	BITU	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.02	-0.84	+1.87
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.55	-1.44	+2.99
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	0.84	+0.34
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.49	-0.93	+2.42
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.09	-1.47	+5.55
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

UYM vs. BITU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UYM Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is higher than the BITU Sharpe Ratio of -0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UYM and BITU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	UYM	BITU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.02	-0.84	+1.87
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.09	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.28	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.09	-0.35	+0.43

Drawdowns

UYM vs. BITU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UYM drawdown since its inception was -92.77%, which is greater than BITU's maximum drawdown of -78.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UYM and BITU.

Drawdown Indicators

	UYM	BITU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-92.77%	-78.94%	-13.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.85%	-78.94%	+55.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-43.88%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-48.25%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-73.31%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.40%	-78.94%	+69.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-42.12%	-34.49%	-7.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.72%	49.84%	-41.12%

Volatility

UYM vs. BITU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Ultra Basic Materials (UYM) is 12.00%, while Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU) has a volatility of 18.99%. This indicates that UYM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UYM	BITU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.00%	18.99%	-6.99%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.85%	69.41%	-43.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	33.72%	87.00%	-53.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	39.26%	97.45%	-58.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	42.77%	97.45%	-54.68%

UYM vs. BITU - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both UYM and BITU have an expense ratio of 0.95%.

Dividends

UYM vs. BITU - Dividend Comparison

UYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, less than BITU's 83.36% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BITU Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF	83.36%	50.23%	0.12%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
UYM ProShares Ultra Basic Materials	1.21%	1.47%	0.98%	0.28%	0.88%	0.52%	0.56%	1.24%	0.94%	0.38%	0.55%	0.42%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UYM and BITU in my portfolio?

UYM and BITU have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, UYM or BITU?

BITU has higher volatility (18.99%) compared to UYM (12.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UYM dropped -92.77% vs BITU's -78.94%.

Which ETF is better, UYM or BITU?

On 1-year performance, UYM leads with 34.35% vs -73.07% for BITU. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, UYM has been the lower-risk option at 12.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, UYM or BITU?

Over the 1-year period, UYM has performed better with a 34.35% return vs -73.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, UYM or BITU?

UYM and BITU have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, UYM or BITU?

BITU has the higher dividend yield at 83.36%, compared with 1.21% for UYM.

What is the main difference between UYM and BITU?

UYM is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while BITU is Cryptocurrency. UYM tracks Dow Jones U.S. Basic Materials Index (200%), while BITU tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index - Benchmark TR Gross.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

UYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.02 vs -0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.