PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UYLD vs. MBS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UYLD vs. MBS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Angel Oak Ultrashort Income ETF (UYLD) and Angel Oak Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (MBS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UYLD achieves a 1.95% return, which is significantly higher than MBS's 0.74% return.


UYLD

1D
0.03%
1M
0.67%
YTD
1.95%
6M
2.40%
1Y
5.14%
3Y*
5.92%
5Y*
10Y*

MBS

1D
0.12%
1M
0.07%
YTD
0.74%
6M
1.02%
1Y
6.50%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UYLD vs. MBS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
UYLD
Angel Oak Ultrashort Income ETF
1.95%5.36%5.16%
MBS
Angel Oak Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF
0.74%8.13%5.78%

Correlation

The correlation between UYLD and MBS is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2024

0.34

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UYLD vs. MBS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UYLD
UYLD Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
UYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
UYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
UYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
UYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

MBS
MBS Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
MBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
MBS Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
MBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
MBS Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UYLD vs. MBS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Angel Oak Ultrashort Income ETF (UYLD) and Angel Oak Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (MBS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UYLDMBSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+5.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+18.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

4.32

1.42

+2.90

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

37.76

2.97

+34.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

225.62

9.28

+216.34

UYLD vs. MBS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UYLD Sharpe Ratio is 7.96, which is higher than the MBS Sharpe Ratio of 2.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UYLD and MBS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UYLDMBSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.96

2.25

+5.71

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

5.99

1.61

+4.38

Drawdowns

UYLD vs. MBS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UYLD drawdown since its inception was -0.54%, smaller than the maximum MBS drawdown of -4.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UYLD and MBS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UYLDMBSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.54%

-4.09%

+3.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.14%

-2.20%

+2.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.35%

+1.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.03%

-1.02%

+0.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.02%

0.70%

-0.68%

Volatility

UYLD vs. MBS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Angel Oak Ultrashort Income ETF (UYLD) is 0.38%, while Angel Oak Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (MBS) has a volatility of 0.89%. This indicates that UYLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MBS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UYLDMBSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.38%

0.89%

-0.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.50%

2.00%

-1.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65%

2.93%

-2.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.00%

3.99%

-2.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.00%

3.99%

-2.99%

UYLD vs. MBS - Expense Ratio Comparison

UYLD has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than MBS's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

UYLD vs. MBS - Dividend Comparison

UYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.03%, less than MBS's 5.61% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
MBS
Angel Oak Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF
5.61%5.28%4.52%0.00%0.00%
UYLD
Angel Oak Ultrashort Income ETF
5.03%5.07%4.97%5.92%0.75%

Frequently Asked Questions


UYLD and MBS have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MBS has higher volatility (0.89%) compared to UYLD (0.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UYLD dropped -0.54% vs MBS's -4.09%.

On 1-year performance, MBS leads with 6.50% vs 5.14% for UYLD. On fees, UYLD is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, UYLD has been the lower-risk option at 0.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MBS has performed better with a 6.50% return vs 5.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

UYLD is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for MBS.

MBS has the higher dividend yield at 5.61%, compared with 5.03% for UYLD.

UYLD is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while MBS is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for UYLD and 0.49% for MBS.

UYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.96 vs 2.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UYLD and MBS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer