UYLD vs. FLJH

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

UYLD (Angel Oak Ultrashort Income ETF) and FLJH (Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UYLD is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Angel Oak, while FLJH is a Japan Equities fund tracking the FTSE Japan RIC Capped Hedged to USD Net Tax Index. UYLD is actively managed, while FLJH is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, UYLD returned 5.92%/yr vs 25.97%/yr for FLJH. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. UYLD charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for FLJH.

Performance

UYLD vs. FLJH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Angel Oak Ultrashort Income ETF (UYLD) and Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UYLD achieves a 2.03% return, which is significantly lower than FLJH's 18.85% return.

UYLD

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: 0.65%
• YTD: 2.03%
• 6M: 2.39%
• 1Y: 5.12%
• 3Y*: 5.92%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FLJH

• 1D: 0.82%
• 1M: 1.43%
• YTD: 18.85%
• 6M: 15.00%
• 1Y: 45.89%
• 3Y*: 25.97%
• 5Y*: 20.54%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UYLD vs. FLJH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
UYLD Angel Oak Ultrashort Income ETF	2.03%	5.36%	6.10%	6.90%	1.09%
FLJH Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF	18.85%	25.26%	25.89%	36.02%	-1.58%

Correlation

The correlation between UYLD and FLJH is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.08
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.04
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2022	-0.01

Return for Risk

UYLD vs. FLJH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UYLD

UYLD Risk / Return Rank: 99
UYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
UYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
UYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 99
UYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
UYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 99

FLJH

FLJH Risk / Return Rank: 86
FLJH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
FLJH Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
FLJH Omega Ratio Rank: 85
FLJH Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
FLJH Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UYLD vs. FLJH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Angel Oak Ultrashort Income ETF (UYLD) and Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	UYLD	FLJH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	8.03	2.46	+5.57
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	22.06	3.35	+18.71
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	4.49	1.45	+3.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	37.30	4.20	+33.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	226.63	16.28	+210.36

UYLD vs. FLJH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UYLD Sharpe Ratio is 8.03, which is higher than the FLJH Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UYLD and FLJH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

UYLD vs. FLJH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UYLD drawdown since its inception was -0.54%, smaller than the maximum FLJH drawdown of -31.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UYLD and FLJH.

Drawdown Indicators

	UYLD	FLJH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.54%	-31.51%	+30.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.14%	-10.80%	+10.66%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-0.54%	-20.39%	+19.85%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-20.39%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.30%	+1.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.03%	-5.30%	+5.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.02%	2.78%	-2.76%

Volatility

UYLD vs. FLJH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Angel Oak Ultrashort Income ETF (UYLD) is 0.36%, while Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH) has a volatility of 5.20%. This indicates that UYLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLJH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UYLD	FLJH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.36%	5.20%	-4.84%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.50%	14.09%	-13.59%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.64%	18.44%	-17.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.00%	18.61%	-17.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.00%	19.84%	-18.84%

UYLD vs. FLJH - Expense Ratio Comparison

UYLD has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than FLJH's 0.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

UYLD vs. FLJH - Dividend Comparison

UYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.03%, more than FLJH's 3.28% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLJH Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF	3.28%	3.90%	5.06%	25.59%	26.67%	1.29%	0.00%	0.00%	5.92%	0.10%
UYLD Angel Oak Ultrashort Income ETF	5.03%	5.07%	4.97%	5.92%	0.75%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UYLD and FLJH in my portfolio?

UYLD and FLJH have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, UYLD or FLJH?

FLJH has higher volatility (5.20%) compared to UYLD (0.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UYLD dropped -0.54% vs FLJH's -31.51%.

Which ETF is better, UYLD or FLJH?

On 3-year performance, FLJH leads with 25.97% vs 5.92% for UYLD. On fees, FLJH is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, UYLD has been the lower-risk option at 0.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, UYLD or FLJH?

Over the 3-year period, FLJH has performed better with a 25.97% return vs 5.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, UYLD or FLJH?

FLJH is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for UYLD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, UYLD or FLJH?

UYLD has the higher dividend yield at 5.03%, compared with 3.28% for FLJH.

What is the main difference between UYLD and FLJH?

UYLD is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while FLJH is Japan Equities. They also come from different issuers: Angel Oak and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for UYLD and 0.09% for FLJH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

UYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (8.03 vs 2.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.