PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UXRP vs. ISCMF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UXRP vs. ISCMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra XRP ETF (UXRP) and iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UXRP achieves a -76.11% return, which is significantly lower than ISCMF's 11.96% return.


UXRP

1D
-2.08%
1M
-21.61%
6M
-80.47%
YTD
-76.11%
1Y
-95.01%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ISCMF

1D
0.00%
1M
-8.88%
6M
11.96%
YTD
11.96%
1Y
22.55%
3Y*
10.82%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UXRP vs. ISCMF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
UXRP
ProShares Ultra XRP ETF
-76.11%-77.43%
ISCMF
iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF
11.96%9.46%

Correlation

The correlation between UXRP and ISCMF is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025

-0.08

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UXRP vs. ISCMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UXRP
UXRP Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
UXRP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UXRP Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
UXRP Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
UXRP Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
UXRP Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

ISCMF
ISCMF Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
ISCMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISCMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISCMF Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
ISCMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISCMF Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UXRP vs. ISCMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra XRP ETF (UXRP) and iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UXRPISCMFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.79

1.84

-1.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.98

1.66

-2.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.21

6.41

-7.62

UXRP vs. ISCMF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UXRP Sharpe Ratio is -0.65, which is lower than the ISCMF Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UXRP and ISCMF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UXRP vs. ISCMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UXRP drawdown since its inception was -96.60%, which is greater than ISCMF's maximum drawdown of -25.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UXRP and ISCMF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UXRPISCMFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.60%

-25.42%

-71.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-96.60%

-13.68%

-82.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-96.21%

-13.68%

-82.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-74.04%

-13.31%

-60.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

78.15%

3.53%

+74.62%

Volatility

UXRP vs. ISCMF - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra XRP ETF (UXRP) has a higher volatility of 27.05% compared to iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF) at 9.30%. This indicates that UXRP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ISCMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UXRPISCMFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

27.05%

9.30%

+17.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

103.11%

18.12%

+84.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

146.10%

19.58%

+126.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

145.88%

14.82%

+131.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

145.88%

14.82%

+131.06%

UXRP vs. ISCMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

UXRP has a 1.67% expense ratio, which is higher than ISCMF's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

UXRP vs. ISCMF - Dividend Comparison

UXRP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, while ISCMF has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


UXRP and ISCMF have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UXRP has higher volatility (27.05%) compared to ISCMF (9.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UXRP dropped -96.60% vs ISCMF's -25.42%.

On 1-year performance, ISCMF leads with 22.55% vs -95.01% for UXRP. On fees, ISCMF is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, ISCMF has been the lower-risk option at 9.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ISCMF has performed better with a 22.55% return vs -95.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ISCMF is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 1.67% for UXRP.

UXRP has the higher dividend yield at 0.02%, compared with 0.00% for ISCMF.

UXRP is categorized as Leveraged Cryptocurrency, while ISCMF is Commodities. UXRP tracks Bloomberg XRP Index, while ISCMF tracks Bloomberg Commodity Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.67% for UXRP and 0.19% for ISCMF.

ISCMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.16 vs -0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UXRP and ISCMF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer