UXJL vs. DDFS
UXJL (FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July) and DDFS (Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - September) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. UXJL charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for DDFS.
Performance
UXJL vs. DDFS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UXJL achieves a 8.46% return, which is significantly higher than DDFS's 3.49% return.
UXJL
- 1D
- -1.53%
- 1M
- -1.62%
- YTD
- 8.46%
- 6M
- 7.35%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DDFS
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- 3.49%
- 6M
- 3.47%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UXJL vs. DDFS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
UXJL FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July | 8.46% | 6.42% |
DDFS Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - September | 3.49% | 3.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between UXJL and DDFS is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 2, 2025 | 0.84 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UXJL vs. DDFS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July (UXJL) and Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - September (DDFS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UXJL vs. DDFS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UXJL drawdown since its inception was -10.29%, which is greater than DDFS's maximum drawdown of -2.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UXJL and DDFS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UXJL | DDFS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.29% | -2.29% | -8.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.71% | -0.27% | -3.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.58% | -0.30% | -1.28% |
Volatility
UXJL vs. DDFS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UXJL | DDFS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.58% | 3.99% | +10.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.58% | 3.99% | +10.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.58% | 3.99% | +10.59% |
UXJL vs. DDFS - Expense Ratio Comparison
UXJL has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than DDFS's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
UXJL vs. DDFS - Dividend Comparison
Neither UXJL nor DDFS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
UXJL and DDFS have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DDFS is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DDFS is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for UXJL.
UXJL and DDFS have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for UXJL and 0.79% for DDFS.
Find the right allocation for UXJL and DDFS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer