UXJL vs. DDFN
UXJL (FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July) and DDFN (Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - November) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. UXJL charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for DDFN.
Performance
UXJL vs. DDFN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UXJL achieves a 11.78% return, which is significantly higher than DDFN's 4.46% return.
UXJL
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- 6.02%
- YTD
- 11.78%
- 6M
- 11.50%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DDFN
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 1.47%
- YTD
- 4.46%
- 6M
- 5.06%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UXJL vs. DDFN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
UXJL FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July | 11.78% | -0.45% |
DDFN Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - November | 4.46% | 0.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between UXJL and DDFN is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2025 | 0.90 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UXJL vs. DDFN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July (UXJL) and Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - November (DDFN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UXJL | DDFN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.87 | 1.73 | +0.14 |
Drawdowns
UXJL vs. DDFN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UXJL drawdown since its inception was -10.29%, which is greater than DDFN's maximum drawdown of -3.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UXJL and DDFN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UXJL | DDFN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.29% | -3.40% | -6.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.76% | -0.22% | -0.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.51% | -0.47% | -1.04% |
Volatility
UXJL vs. DDFN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UXJL | DDFN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.90% | 5.26% | +8.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.90% | 5.26% | +8.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.90% | 5.26% | +8.64% |
UXJL vs. DDFN - Expense Ratio Comparison
UXJL has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than DDFN's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
UXJL vs. DDFN - Dividend Comparison
Neither UXJL nor DDFN has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
UXJL and DDFN have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DDFN is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DDFN is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for UXJL.
UXJL and DDFN have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for UXJL and 0.79% for DDFN.
Find the right allocation for UXJL and DDFN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer