DDFN vs. BAPR

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

DDFN (Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - November) and BAPR (Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April) are both Defined Outcome funds from Innovator. DDFN is actively managed, while BAPR is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.86 means they have usually moved in the same direction. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.

Performance

DDFN vs. BAPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - November (DDFN) and Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (BAPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DDFN achieves a 5.66% return, which is significantly lower than BAPR's 12.27% return.

DDFN

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: 0.97%
• 6M: 4.73%
• YTD: 5.66%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

BAPR

• 1D: 0.32%
• 1M: 1.22%
• 6M: 11.30%
• YTD: 12.27%
• 1Y: 18.49%
• 3Y*: 14.40%
• 5Y*: 10.95%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 10.84%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BAPR Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April	$301.62K	$564.24K	$486.34K
DDFN Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - November	$131.99K	$287.51K	$930.09K

DDFN vs. BAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DDFN Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - November	5.66%	0.74%
BAPR Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April	12.27%	1.54%

Correlation

The correlation between DDFN and BAPR is 0.86, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2025	0.86

DDFN vs. BAPR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DDFN	BAPR
Technology	37.9%	37.9%
Financial Services	11.7%	11.7%
Communication Services	10.0%	10.0%
Consumer Cyclical	9.6%	9.6%
Healthcare	9.1%	9.1%
Industrials	8.4%	8.4%
Consumer Defensive	4.6%	4.6%
Energy	3.0%	3.0%
Utilities	2.3%	2.3%
Real Estate	1.9%	1.9%
Basic Materials	1.7%	1.7%

Return for Risk

DDFN vs. BAPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DDFN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BAPR

BAPR Risk / Return Rank: 97
BAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
BAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
BAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 97
BAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
BAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DDFN vs. BAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - November (DDFN) and Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (BAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DDFN	BAPR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	3.16	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	5.18	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.73	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	9.61	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	44.13	—

Drawdowns

DDFN vs. BAPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDFN drawdown since its inception was -3.40%, smaller than the maximum BAPR drawdown of -23.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDFN and BAPR.

Drawdown Indicators

	DDFN	BAPR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.40%	-23.91%	+20.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-1.93%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-15.58%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-15.58%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.44%	-2.55%	+2.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.42%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DDFN	BAPR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	1.73%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	5.16%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.09%	5.90%	-0.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.09%	11.51%	-6.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.09%	13.01%	-7.92%

DDFN vs. BAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DDFN and BAPR have an expense ratio of 0.79%.

Dividends

DDFN vs. BAPR - Dividend Comparison

Neither DDFN nor BAPR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DDFN and BAPR in my portfolio?

DDFN and BAPR have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, DDFN or BAPR?

Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DDFN or BAPR?

DDFN and BAPR have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DDFN or BAPR?

DDFN and BAPR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.