UXI vs. CIFG
UXI (ProShares Ultra Industrials) and CIFG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. UXI is passively managed, while CIFG is actively managed. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. UXI charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for CIFG.
Performance
UXI vs. CIFG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UXI achieves a 27.75% return, which is significantly lower than CIFG's 96.56% return.
UXI
- 1D
- -3.58%
- 1M
- 7.77%
- YTD
- 27.75%
- 6M
- 24.69%
- 1Y
- 45.13%
- 3Y*
- 35.06%
- 5Y*
- 13.19%
- 10Y*
- 20.48%
CIFG
- 1D
- -3.87%
- 1M
- 42.24%
- YTD
- 96.56%
- 6M
- 67.07%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UXI vs. CIFG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
UXI ProShares Ultra Industrials | 27.75% | -0.89% |
CIFG Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF | 96.56% | -32.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between UXI and CIFG is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025 | 0.53 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UXI vs. CIFG — Risk / Return Rank
UXI
CIFG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
UXI vs. CIFG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Industrials (UXI) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF (CIFG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UXI | CIFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.92 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.78 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UXI vs. CIFG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UXI drawdown since its inception was -89.01%, which is greater than CIFG's maximum drawdown of -71.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UXI and CIFG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UXI | CIFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.01% | -71.71% | -17.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.59% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.42% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.25% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.48% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.58% | -10.44% | +6.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.56% | -35.54% | +12.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.68% | — | — |
Volatility
UXI vs. CIFG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UXI | CIFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.23% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.22% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.61% | 205.93% | -173.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.13% | 205.93% | -169.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.50% | 205.93% | -166.43% |
UXI vs. CIFG - Expense Ratio Comparison
UXI has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than CIFG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
UXI vs. CIFG - Dividend Comparison
UXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%, while CIFG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIFG Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UXI ProShares Ultra Industrials | 0.64% | 0.90% | 0.18% | 0.21% | 0.24% | 0.03% | 0.29% | 0.58% | 0.37% | 0.24% | 0.38% | 0.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UXI and CIFG have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CIFG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CIFG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for UXI.
UXI has the higher dividend yield at 0.64%, compared with 0.00% for CIFG.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for UXI and 0.75% for CIFG.
Find the right allocation for UXI and CIFG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer