PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UX vs. GNR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

UX vs. GNR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Uranium ETF (UX) and SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

UX vs. GNR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
UX
Roundhill Uranium ETF
2.86%15.76%
GNR
SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF
19.84%22.41%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UX achieves a 2.86% return, which is significantly lower than GNR's 19.84% return.


UX

1D
4.92%
1M
-0.77%
YTD
2.86%
6M
-0.22%
1Y
36.86%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GNR

1D
-0.27%
1M
-1.86%
YTD
19.84%
6M
27.71%
1Y
43.54%
3Y*
13.30%
5Y*
11.99%
10Y*
11.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


UX vs. GNR - Expense Ratio Comparison

UX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than GNR's 0.40% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

UX vs. GNR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UX
UX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
UX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
UX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
UX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
UX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

GNR
GNR Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
GNR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GNR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
GNR Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
GNR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
GNR Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UX vs. GNR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Uranium ETF (UX) and SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UXGNRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.98

2.11

-1.14

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.53

2.71

-1.18

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.41

-0.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.63

2.98

-1.35

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.02

15.59

-11.57

UX vs. GNR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UX Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is lower than the GNR Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UX and GNR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UXGNRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

2.11

-1.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.26

+0.17

Correlation

The correlation between UX and GNR is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

UX vs. GNR - Dividend Comparison

UX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%, less than GNR's 2.31% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
UX
Roundhill Uranium ETF
1.44%1.48%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GNR
SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF
2.31%2.76%4.73%3.37%4.37%3.44%2.78%3.84%3.51%2.40%2.06%4.59%

Drawdowns

UX vs. GNR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UX drawdown since its inception was -23.72%, smaller than the maximum GNR drawdown of -51.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UX and GNR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


UXGNRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.72%

-51.37%

+27.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.72%

-14.80%

-8.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.78%

-1.86%

-14.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.07%

-15.10%

+6.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.61%

2.83%

+6.78%

Volatility

UX vs. GNR - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill Uranium ETF (UX) has a higher volatility of 12.49% compared to SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR) at 5.51%. This indicates that UX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GNR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


UXGNRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.49%

5.51%

+6.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.48%

13.76%

+13.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.90%

20.70%

+17.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.52%

20.35%

+17.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.52%

22.01%

+15.51%