PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UWM vs. VMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UWM vs. VMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Russell2000 (UWM) and Invesco Municipal Opportunity Trust (VMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UWM achieves a 31.87% return, which is significantly higher than VMO's 4.65% return. Over the past 10 years, UWM has outperformed VMO with an annualized return of 12.16%, while VMO has yielded a comparatively lower 1.79% annualized return.


UWM

1D
-2.69%
1M
6.41%
YTD
31.87%
6M
28.56%
1Y
76.77%
3Y*
25.03%
5Y*
1.71%
10Y*
12.16%

VMO

1D
-0.61%
1M
2.44%
YTD
4.65%
6M
5.55%
1Y
15.04%
3Y*
7.99%
5Y*
-1.01%
10Y*
1.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UWM vs. VMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UWM
ProShares Ultra Russell2000
31.87%13.59%11.32%22.62%-43.69%23.91%16.57%48.62%-25.89%26.92%
VMO
Invesco Municipal Opportunity Trust
4.65%6.57%7.73%1.54%-24.29%12.95%8.89%16.23%-4.54%3.05%

Correlation

The correlation between UWM and VMO is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2007

0.16

The correlation between UWM and VMO shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (all time) to 0.33 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UWM vs. VMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UWM
UWM Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
UWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
UWM Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
UWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
UWM Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

VMO
VMO Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
VMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
VMO Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
VMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
VMO Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UWM vs. VMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Russell2000 (UWM) and Invesco Municipal Opportunity Trust (VMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UWMVMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.32

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.46

2.29

+1.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.85

8.85

+3.00

UWM vs. VMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UWM Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is comparable to the VMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UWM and VMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UWMVMODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.03

1.71

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

-0.09

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

0.14

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.14

0.26

-0.12

Drawdowns

UWM vs. VMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UWM drawdown since its inception was -88.21%, which is greater than VMO's maximum drawdown of -50.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UWM and VMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UWMVMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.21%

-50.11%

-38.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.28%

-6.59%

-15.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-49.79%

-16.51%

-33.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-61.62%

-37.70%

-23.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-71.46%

-37.70%

-33.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.55%

-8.02%

+4.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.88%

-9.87%

-21.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.50%

1.70%

+4.80%

Volatility

UWM vs. VMO - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra Russell2000 (UWM) has a higher volatility of 11.45% compared to Invesco Municipal Opportunity Trust (VMO) at 3.76%. This indicates that UWM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UWMVMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.45%

3.76%

+7.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.82%

6.72%

+20.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.04%

8.87%

+29.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

45.01%

11.53%

+33.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.08%

12.67%

+33.41%

Dividends

UWM vs. VMO - Dividend Comparison

UWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, less than VMO's 7.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
UWM
ProShares Ultra Russell2000
0.78%1.05%1.16%0.34%0.40%0.00%0.07%0.55%0.41%0.11%0.27%0.23%
VMO
Invesco Municipal Opportunity Trust
7.73%7.84%6.44%4.47%5.69%4.64%4.66%4.94%5.95%5.98%6.73%6.33%

Frequently Asked Questions


UWM and VMO have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UWM has higher volatility (11.45%) compared to VMO (3.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UWM dropped -88.21% vs VMO's -50.11%.

UWM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UWM and VMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer