PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UWM vs. NVDG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

UWM vs. NVDG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Russell2000 (UWM) and Leverage Shares 2X Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

UWM vs. NVDG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
UWM
ProShares Ultra Russell2000
-0.59%13.59%-10.19%
NVDG
Leverage Shares 2X Long NVDA Daily ETF
-17.87%32.45%-0.75%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UWM achieves a -0.59% return, which is significantly higher than NVDG's -17.87% return.


UWM

1D
7.02%
1M
-10.65%
YTD
-0.59%
6M
1.22%
1Y
40.99%
3Y*
14.68%
5Y*
-3.44%
10Y*
9.88%

NVDG

1D
11.02%
1M
-5.35%
YTD
-17.87%
6M
-22.83%
1Y
93.26%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


UWM vs. NVDG - Expense Ratio Comparison

UWM has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than NVDG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

UWM vs. NVDG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UWM
UWM Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
UWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
UWM Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
UWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
UWM Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDG
NVDG Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
NVDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDG Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDG Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UWM vs. NVDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Russell2000 (UWM) and Leverage Shares 2X Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UWMNVDGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.89

1.15

-0.26

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.46

1.91

-0.45

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.24

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.50

2.11

-0.61

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.12

5.07

+0.05

UWM vs. NVDG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UWM Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is comparable to the NVDG Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UWM and NVDG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UWMNVDGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

1.15

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.11

0.07

+0.05

Correlation

The correlation between UWM and NVDG is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

UWM vs. NVDG - Dividend Comparison

UWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, less than NVDG's 14.38% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
UWM
ProShares Ultra Russell2000
1.04%1.05%1.16%0.34%0.40%0.00%0.07%0.55%0.41%0.11%0.27%0.23%
NVDG
Leverage Shares 2X Long NVDA Daily ETF
14.38%11.81%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

UWM vs. NVDG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UWM drawdown since its inception was -88.21%, which is greater than NVDG's maximum drawdown of -66.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UWM and NVDG.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


UWMNVDGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.21%

-66.19%

-22.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.48%

-42.72%

+16.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-61.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-71.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.29%

-36.40%

+9.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.07%

-24.00%

-7.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.76%

17.77%

-10.01%

Volatility

UWM vs. NVDG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Ultra Russell2000 (UWM) is 14.81%, while Leverage Shares 2X Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDG) has a volatility of 20.82%. This indicates that UWM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


UWMNVDGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.81%

20.82%

-6.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.72%

51.08%

-22.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.23%

81.33%

-35.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

45.05%

92.52%

-47.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.00%

92.52%

-46.52%