PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UVAL.L vs. VIG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UVAL.L vs. VIG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI USA Value Weighted UCITS ETF (UVAL.L) and Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

UVAL.L is traded in GBP, while VIG is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VIG values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UVAL.L achieves a 31.16% return, which is significantly higher than VIG's 7.97% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with UVAL.L having a 13.99% annualized return and VIG not far ahead at 14.12%.


UVAL.L

1D
-0.05%
1M
18.76%
YTD
31.16%
6M
34.50%
1Y
67.14%
3Y*
23.73%
5Y*
13.79%
10Y*
13.99%

VIG

1D
0.08%
1M
4.63%
YTD
7.97%
6M
6.42%
1Y
20.46%
3Y*
13.60%
5Y*
11.81%
10Y*
14.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UVAL.L vs. VIG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UVAL.L
SPDR MSCI USA Value Weighted UCITS ETF
31.16%19.90%6.56%9.53%-4.90%31.55%-1.54%22.51%-7.42%8.19%
VIG
Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF
7.97%6.03%19.03%8.79%0.93%24.93%12.04%24.69%3.72%11.65%

Correlation

The correlation between UVAL.L and VIG is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2015

0.53

The correlation between UVAL.L and VIG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

UVAL.L vs. VIG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
UVAL.L
VIG

Technology

41.0%
26.2%

Financial Services

11.6%
20.6%

Healthcare

9.1%
16.5%

Communication Services

9.0%
0.5%

Consumer Cyclical

8.9%
4.7%

Industrials

6.8%
11.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.3%
10.1%

Energy

3.6%
3.5%

Utilities

2.1%
3.2%

Real Estate

1.8%

-

Basic Materials

1.8%
3.5%

Technology

UVAL.L
41.0%
VIG
26.2%

Financial Services

UVAL.L
11.6%
VIG
20.6%

Healthcare

UVAL.L
9.1%
VIG
16.5%

Communication Services

UVAL.L
9.0%
VIG
0.5%

Consumer Cyclical

UVAL.L
8.9%
VIG
4.7%

Industrials

UVAL.L
6.8%
VIG
11.8%

Consumer Defensive

UVAL.L
4.3%
VIG
10.1%

Energy

UVAL.L
3.6%
VIG
3.5%

Utilities

UVAL.L
2.1%
VIG
3.2%

Real Estate

UVAL.L
1.8%
VIG

-

Basic Materials

UVAL.L
1.8%
VIG
3.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UVAL.L vs. VIG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UVAL.L
UVAL.L Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
UVAL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UVAL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
UVAL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
UVAL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
UVAL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

VIG
VIG Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
VIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
VIG Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
VIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
VIG Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UVAL.L vs. VIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI USA Value Weighted UCITS ETF (UVAL.L) and Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UVAL.LVIGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.88

1.37

+0.51

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

12.08

3.51

+8.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

42.84

12.40

+30.44

UVAL.L vs. VIG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UVAL.L Sharpe Ratio is 4.96, which is higher than the VIG Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UVAL.L and VIG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UVAL.LVIGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.96

2.05

+2.91

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

0.87

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

0.86

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

0.72

+0.02

Drawdowns

UVAL.L vs. VIG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UVAL.L drawdown since its inception was -32.55%, which is greater than VIG's maximum drawdown of -25.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UVAL.L and VIG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UVAL.LVIGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.55%

-25.14%

-7.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.53%

-5.86%

+0.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.03%

-17.62%

-3.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.03%

-17.62%

-3.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.55%

-23.45%

-9.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.05%

0.00%

-0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.12%

-3.83%

-1.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.56%

1.65%

-0.09%

Volatility

UVAL.L vs. VIG - Volatility Comparison

SPDR MSCI USA Value Weighted UCITS ETF (UVAL.L) has a higher volatility of 5.62% compared to Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) at 2.57%. This indicates that UVAL.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VIG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UVAL.LVIGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.62%

2.57%

+3.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.96%

7.49%

+2.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.53%

10.05%

+3.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.49%

13.60%

+1.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.34%

16.56%

+0.78%

UVAL.L vs. VIG - Expense Ratio Comparison

UVAL.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VIG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

UVAL.L vs. VIG - Dividend Comparison

UVAL.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
UVAL.L
SPDR MSCI USA Value Weighted UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VIG
Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF
1.47%1.62%1.73%1.88%1.96%1.55%1.63%1.71%2.08%1.88%2.14%2.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


UVAL.L and VIG have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VIG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VIG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for UVAL.L.

UVAL.L is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while VIG is Dividend. UVAL.L tracks Russell 1000 Value TR USD, while VIG tracks S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for UVAL.L and 0.04% for VIG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UVAL.L and VIG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer