PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UUUU vs. SCCO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

UUUU vs. SCCO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Energy Fuels Inc. (UUUU) and Southern Copper Corporation (SCCO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UUUU achieves a 3.44% return, which is significantly lower than SCCO's 36.04% return. Over the past 10 years, UUUU has underperformed SCCO with an annualized return of 20.04%, while SCCO has yielded a comparatively higher 27.50% annualized return.


UUUU

1D
-0.27%
1M
-18.31%
YTD
3.44%
6M
3.23%
1Y
167.62%
3Y*
32.20%
5Y*
16.43%
10Y*
20.04%

SCCO

1D
4.19%
1M
7.36%
YTD
36.04%
6M
37.05%
1Y
112.80%
3Y*
44.36%
5Y*
29.82%
10Y*
27.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UUUU vs. SCCO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UUUU
Energy Fuels Inc.
3.44%183.43%-28.65%15.78%-18.61%79.11%123.04%-32.98%59.22%9.15%
SCCO
Southern Copper Corporation
36.04%66.62%9.45%50.12%4.25%-0.62%58.79%46.59%-33.11%50.79%

Correlation

The correlation between UUUU and SCCO is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2006

0.30

Fundamentals

EPS

UUUU:

-$0.41

SCCO:

$6.04

PS Ratio

UUUU:

30.36

SCCO:

10.73

Total Revenue (TTM)

UUUU:

$84.86M

SCCO:

$14.55B

Gross Profit (TTM)

UUUU:

$31.69M

SCCO:

$6.04B

EBITDA (TTM)

UUUU:

-$78.89M

SCCO:

$8.80B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UUUU vs. SCCO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UUUU
UUUU Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
UUUU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UUUU Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
UUUU Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
UUUU Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
UUUU Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

SCCO
SCCO Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
SCCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCCO Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
SCCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCCO Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UUUU vs. SCCO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Energy Fuels Inc. (UUUU) and Southern Copper Corporation (SCCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UUUUSCCODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.33

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.53

3.67

-0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.84

10.44

-3.60

UUUU vs. SCCO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UUUU Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is comparable to the SCCO Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UUUU and SCCO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UUUU vs. SCCO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UUUU drawdown since its inception was -99.64%, which is greater than SCCO's maximum drawdown of -78.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UUUU and SCCO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UUUUSCCODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.64%

-78.60%

-21.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-51.28%

-30.22%

-21.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-61.52%

-39.69%

-21.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-68.70%

-43.07%

-25.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-79.31%

-54.83%

-24.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-93.60%

-11.95%

-81.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-92.63%

-22.04%

-70.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

26.43%

10.59%

+15.84%

Volatility

UUUU vs. SCCO - Volatility Comparison

Energy Fuels Inc. (UUUU) has a higher volatility of 27.22% compared to Southern Copper Corporation (SCCO) at 20.20%. This indicates that UUUU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCCO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UUUUSCCODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

27.22%

20.20%

+7.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

67.09%

41.65%

+25.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

95.70%

49.66%

+46.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

73.40%

39.97%

+33.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

72.59%

37.55%

+35.04%

Dividends

UUUU vs. SCCO - Dividend Comparison

UUUU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCCO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCCO
Southern Copper Corporation
1.93%2.13%2.29%4.65%5.80%5.19%2.30%4.81%4.55%1.24%0.56%1.30%
UUUU
Energy Fuels Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

UUUU vs. SCCO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Energy Fuels Inc. and Southern Copper Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B20222023202420252026
35.84M
4.25B
(UUUU) Total Revenue
(SCCO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

UUUU vs. SCCO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Energy Fuels Inc. and Southern Copper Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-40.0%-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
40.1%
0
Portfolio components
UUUU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Energy Fuels Inc. reported a gross profit of 14.36M and revenue of 35.84M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.1%.

SCCO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Southern Copper Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 4.25B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

UUUU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Energy Fuels Inc. reported an operating income of -16.93M and revenue of 35.84M, resulting in an operating margin of -47.2%.

SCCO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Southern Copper Corporation reported an operating income of 2.48B and revenue of 4.25B, resulting in an operating margin of 58.3%.

UUUU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Energy Fuels Inc. reported a net income of -10.84M and revenue of 35.84M, resulting in a net margin of -30.3%.

SCCO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Southern Copper Corporation reported a net income of 1.58B and revenue of 4.25B, resulting in a net margin of 37.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


UUUU and SCCO have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UUUU has higher volatility (27.22%) compared to SCCO (20.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UUUU dropped -99.64% vs SCCO's -78.60%.

SCCO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UUUU and SCCO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer