PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UUUU vs. QXO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

UUUU vs. QXO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Energy Fuels Inc. (UUUU) and QXO, Inc (QXO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UUUU achieves a 4.61% return, which is significantly higher than QXO's -19.44% return. Over the past 10 years, UUUU has outperformed QXO with an annualized return of 19.89%, while QXO has yielded a comparatively lower 7.76% annualized return.


UUUU

1D
1.20%
1M
-28.86%
YTD
4.61%
6M
-1.81%
1Y
178.06%
3Y*
33.73%
5Y*
17.50%
10Y*
19.89%

QXO

1D
-1.40%
1M
-17.16%
YTD
-19.44%
6M
-26.94%
1Y
-18.21%
3Y*
-7.59%
5Y*
-19.91%
10Y*
7.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UUUU vs. QXO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UUUU
Energy Fuels Inc.
4.61%183.43%-28.65%15.78%-18.61%79.11%123.04%-32.98%59.22%9.15%
QXO
QXO, Inc
-19.44%21.32%-86.06%508.46%-33.78%63.72%-17.22%92.05%-45.15%43.66%

Correlation

The correlation between UUUU and QXO is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 2012

0.11

The correlation between UUUU and QXO shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (all time) to 0.25 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

UUUU:

-$0.41

QXO:

-$1.03

PS Ratio

UUUU:

30.70

QXO:

0.91

Total Revenue (TTM)

UUUU:

$84.86M

QXO:

$8.56B

Gross Profit (TTM)

UUUU:

$31.69M

QXO:

$1.98B

EBITDA (TTM)

UUUU:

-$78.89M

QXO:

-$152.95M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UUUU vs. QXO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UUUU
UUUU Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
UUUU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UUUU Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
UUUU Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
UUUU Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
UUUU Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

QXO
QXO Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
QXO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QXO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
QXO Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
QXO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
QXO Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UUUU vs. QXO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Energy Fuels Inc. (UUUU) and QXO, Inc (QXO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UUUUQXODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

0.99

+0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.49

-0.43

+3.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.95

-0.90

+7.84

UUUU vs. QXO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UUUU Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is higher than the QXO Sharpe Ratio of -0.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UUUU and QXO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UUUUQXODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.88

-0.31

+2.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

-0.14

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

0.06

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.14

0.05

-0.19

Drawdowns

UUUU vs. QXO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UUUU drawdown since its inception was -99.64%, roughly equal to the maximum QXO drawdown of -95.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UUUU and QXO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UUUUQXODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.64%

-95.44%

-4.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-51.28%

-42.59%

-8.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-61.52%

-95.44%

+33.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-68.70%

-95.44%

+26.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-79.31%

-95.44%

+16.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-93.52%

-93.40%

-0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-92.65%

-56.37%

-36.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

25.75%

20.33%

+5.42%

Volatility

UUUU vs. QXO - Volatility Comparison

Energy Fuels Inc. (UUUU) has a higher volatility of 25.85% compared to QXO, Inc (QXO) at 14.68%. This indicates that UUUU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QXO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UUUUQXODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.85%

14.68%

+11.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

66.21%

46.00%

+20.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

95.27%

58.69%

+36.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

73.23%

145.36%

-72.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

72.54%

123.58%

-51.04%

Dividends

UUUU vs. QXO - Dividend Comparison

Neither UUUU nor QXO has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
QXO
QXO, Inc
0.00%0.00%164.53%1.17%0.00%13.42%31.47%1.15%0.00%1.89%2.00%
UUUU
Energy Fuels Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

UUUU vs. QXO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Energy Fuels Inc. and QXO, Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B20222023202420252026
35.84M
1.73B
(UUUU) Total Revenue
(QXO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

UUUU vs. QXO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Energy Fuels Inc. and QXO, Inc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-40.0%-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
40.1%
23.7%
Portfolio components
UUUU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Energy Fuels Inc. reported a gross profit of 14.36M and revenue of 35.84M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.1%.

QXO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, QXO, Inc reported a gross profit of 409.30M and revenue of 1.73B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.7%.

UUUU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Energy Fuels Inc. reported an operating income of -16.93M and revenue of 35.84M, resulting in an operating margin of -47.2%.

QXO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, QXO, Inc reported an operating income of -251.90M and revenue of 1.73B, resulting in an operating margin of -14.6%.

UUUU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Energy Fuels Inc. reported a net income of -10.84M and revenue of 35.84M, resulting in a net margin of -30.3%.

QXO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, QXO, Inc reported a net income of -227.10M and revenue of 1.73B, resulting in a net margin of -13.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


UUUU and QXO have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UUUU has higher volatility (25.85%) compared to QXO (14.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UUUU dropped -99.64% vs QXO's -95.44%.

UUUU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs -0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UUUU and QXO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer