PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QXO vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QXO vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in QXO, Inc (QXO) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QXO achieves a -7.83% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's 7.43% return. Over the past 10 years, QXO has underperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of 8.56%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively higher 13.70% annualized return.


QXO

1D
-1.22%
1M
2.18%
YTD
-7.83%
6M
-16.29%
1Y
-18.14%
3Y*
-7.64%
5Y*
-23.41%
10Y*
8.56%

^GSPC

1D
-0.05%
1M
-2.21%
YTD
7.43%
6M
6.12%
1Y
19.75%
3Y*
18.87%
5Y*
11.43%
10Y*
13.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QXO vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QXO
QXO, Inc
-7.83%21.32%-86.06%508.46%-33.78%63.72%-17.22%92.05%-45.15%43.66%
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
7.43%16.39%23.31%24.23%-19.44%26.89%16.26%28.88%-6.24%19.42%

Correlation

The correlation between QXO and ^GSPC is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 15, 2012

0.13

Over the past year, QXO and ^GSPC have become more correlated (0.49) than their long-term average of 0.13, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QXO vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QXO
QXO Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
QXO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QXO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
QXO Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
QXO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
QXO Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QXO vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for QXO, Inc (QXO) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QXO^GSPCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.29

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.41

2.18

-2.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.92

9.54

-10.46

QXO vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QXO Sharpe Ratio is -0.31, which is lower than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QXO and ^GSPC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QXO vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QXO drawdown since its inception was -95.44%, which is greater than ^GSPC's maximum drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QXO and ^GSPC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QXO^GSPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.44%

-56.78%

-38.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-44.37%

-9.10%

-35.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-95.44%

-18.90%

-76.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-95.44%

-25.43%

-70.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-95.44%

-33.92%

-61.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-92.45%

-3.36%

-89.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-56.49%

-10.71%

-45.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.75%

2.07%

+17.68%

Volatility

QXO vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

QXO, Inc (QXO) has a higher volatility of 20.31% compared to S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) at 4.82%. This indicates that QXO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QXO^GSPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.31%

4.82%

+15.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

49.04%

9.87%

+39.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

59.34%

12.50%

+46.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

145.08%

16.99%

+128.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

123.61%

18.07%

+105.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


QXO and ^GSPC have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QXO has higher volatility (20.31%) compared to ^GSPC (4.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QXO dropped -95.44% vs ^GSPC's -56.78%.

^GSPC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs -0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QXO and ^GSPC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer