PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QXO vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QXO vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in QXO, Inc (QXO) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QXO achieves a -20.06% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's 10.05% return. Over the past 10 years, QXO has underperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of 7.67%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively higher 13.27% annualized return.


QXO

1D
0.65%
1M
-9.35%
6M
-38.37%
YTD
-20.06%
1Y
-27.23%
3Y*
-10.79%
5Y*
-25.04%
10Y*
7.67%

^GSPC

1D
-0.51%
1M
0.30%
6M
8.49%
YTD
10.05%
1Y
20.28%
3Y*
18.54%
5Y*
11.73%
10Y*
13.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QXO vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QXO
QXO, Inc
-20.06%21.32%-86.06%508.46%-33.78%63.72%-17.22%92.05%-45.15%43.66%
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
10.05%16.39%23.31%24.23%-19.44%26.89%16.26%28.88%-6.24%19.42%

Correlation

The correlation between QXO and ^GSPC is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 15, 2012

0.13

Over the past year, QXO and ^GSPC have become more correlated (0.49) than their long-term average of 0.13, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QXO vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QXO
QXO Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
QXO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QXO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
QXO Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
QXO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
QXO Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QXO vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for QXO, Inc (QXO) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QXO^GSPCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

1.29

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.56

2.24

-2.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.24

9.71

-10.95

QXO vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QXO Sharpe Ratio is -0.45, which is lower than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QXO and ^GSPC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QXO vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QXO drawdown since its inception was -95.44%, which is greater than ^GSPC's maximum drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QXO and ^GSPC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QXO^GSPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.44%

-56.78%

-38.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-48.69%

-9.10%

-39.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-95.44%

-18.90%

-76.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-95.44%

-25.43%

-70.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-95.44%

-33.92%

-61.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-93.46%

-1.00%

-92.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-56.62%

-10.70%

-45.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.00%

2.09%

+19.91%

Volatility

QXO vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

QXO, Inc (QXO) has a higher volatility of 18.97% compared to S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) at 3.25%. This indicates that QXO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QXO^GSPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.97%

3.25%

+15.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.50%

10.00%

+36.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

60.33%

12.56%

+47.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

144.46%

17.00%

+127.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

123.63%

18.05%

+105.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


QXO and ^GSPC have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QXO has higher volatility (18.97%) compared to ^GSPC (3.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QXO dropped -95.44% vs ^GSPC's -56.78%.

^GSPC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs -0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QXO and ^GSPC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer