UUUU vs. QBTS
UUUU (Energy Fuels Inc.) and QBTS (D-Wave Quantum Inc) are both stocks. UUUU operates in Uranium (Energy), while QBTS operates in Computer Hardware (Technology). Over the past 3 years, UUUU returned 32.20%/yr vs 123.62%/yr for QBTS. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
UUUU vs. QBTS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UUUU achieves a 3.44% return, which is significantly higher than QBTS's -10.63% return.
UUUU
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- -25.47%
- YTD
- 3.44%
- 6M
- 3.23%
- 1Y
- 180.07%
- 3Y*
- 32.20%
- 5Y*
- 16.43%
- 10Y*
- 20.04%
QBTS
- 1D
- -1.89%
- 1M
- 9.00%
- YTD
- -10.63%
- 6M
- -10.46%
- 1Y
- 47.17%
- 3Y*
- 123.62%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UUUU vs. QBTS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UUUU Energy Fuels Inc. | 3.44% | 183.43% | -28.65% | 15.78% | -11.03% |
QBTS D-Wave Quantum Inc | -10.63% | 211.31% | 854.44% | -38.88% | -83.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between UUUU and QBTS is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 8, 2022 | 0.27 |
Over the past year, UUUU and QBTS have become more correlated (0.51) than their long-term average of 0.27, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
UUUU:
-$0.41
QBTS:
-$1.08
UUUU:
30.36
QBTS:
637.12
UUUU:
$84.86M
QBTS:
$12.44M
UUUU:
$31.69M
QBTS:
$8.25M
UUUU:
-$78.89M
QBTS:
-$399.03M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UUUU vs. QBTS — Risk / Return Rank
UUUU
QBTS
UUUU vs. QBTS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Energy Fuels Inc. (UUUU) and D-Wave Quantum Inc (QBTS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UUUU | QBTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.16 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.53 | 0.67 | +2.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.84 | 1.16 | +5.68 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UUUU vs. QBTS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UUUU drawdown since its inception was -99.64%, roughly equal to the maximum QBTS drawdown of -96.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UUUU and QBTS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UUUU | QBTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.64% | -96.67% | -2.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -51.28% | -71.01% | +19.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -61.52% | -79.17% | +17.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -68.70% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -79.31% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -93.60% | -47.81% | -45.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -92.63% | -65.66% | -26.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.43% | 40.64% | -14.21% |
Volatility
UUUU vs. QBTS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Energy Fuels Inc. (UUUU) is 27.22%, while D-Wave Quantum Inc (QBTS) has a volatility of 42.66%. This indicates that UUUU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QBTS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UUUU | QBTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 27.22% | 42.66% | -15.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 67.09% | 76.89% | -9.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 95.70% | 108.46% | -12.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 73.40% | 150.99% | -77.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 72.59% | 150.99% | -78.40% |
Dividends
UUUU vs. QBTS - Dividend Comparison
Neither UUUU nor QBTS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
UUUU vs. QBTS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Energy Fuels Inc. and D-Wave Quantum Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
UUUU and QBTS have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QBTS has higher volatility (42.66%) compared to UUUU (27.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UUUU dropped -99.64% vs QBTS's -96.67%.
UUUU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UUUU and QBTS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer