PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UUUU vs. MKA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

UUUU vs. MKA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Energy Fuels Inc. (UUUU) and Mkango Resources Ltd (MKA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

UUUU is traded in USD, while MKA.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the MKA.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UUUU achieves a 3.44% return, which is significantly higher than MKA.L's -8.16% return.


UUUU

1D
-0.27%
1M
-22.87%
YTD
3.44%
6M
3.23%
1Y
167.62%
3Y*
32.20%
5Y*
16.43%
10Y*
20.04%

MKA.L

1D
1.98%
1M
-5.57%
YTD
-8.16%
6M
-17.32%
1Y
155.84%
3Y*
60.60%
5Y*
5.78%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UUUU vs. MKA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UUUU
Energy Fuels Inc.
3.44%183.43%-28.65%15.78%-18.61%79.11%123.04%-32.98%59.22%9.15%
MKA.L
Mkango Resources Ltd
-8.16%529.04%-32.02%-1.17%-64.71%75.54%109.72%4.01%11.91%144.31%

Correlation

The correlation between UUUU and MKA.L is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2016

0.09

Fundamentals

EPS

UUUU:

-$0.41

MKA.L:

-$0.04

PS Ratio

UUUU:

30.36

MKA.L:

3.72K

Total Revenue (TTM)

UUUU:

$84.86M

MKA.L:

$50.78K

Gross Profit (TTM)

UUUU:

$31.69M

MKA.L:

-$544.15K

EBITDA (TTM)

UUUU:

-$78.89M

MKA.L:

-$17.87M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UUUU vs. MKA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UUUU
UUUU Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
UUUU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UUUU Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
UUUU Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
UUUU Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
UUUU Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

MKA.L
MKA.L Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
MKA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MKA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
MKA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
MKA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
MKA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UUUU vs. MKA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Energy Fuels Inc. (UUUU) and Mkango Resources Ltd (MKA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UUUUMKA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.29

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.53

3.00

+0.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.84

6.16

+0.68

UUUU vs. MKA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UUUU Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is comparable to the MKA.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UUUU and MKA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UUUU vs. MKA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UUUU drawdown since its inception was -99.64%, which is greater than MKA.L's maximum drawdown of -89.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UUUU and MKA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UUUUMKA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.64%

-89.22%

-10.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-51.28%

-51.55%

+0.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-61.52%

-66.46%

+4.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-68.70%

-89.22%

+20.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-79.31%

-89.22%

+9.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-93.60%

-37.46%

-56.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-92.63%

-45.43%

-47.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

26.43%

25.19%

+1.24%

Volatility

UUUU vs. MKA.L - Volatility Comparison

Energy Fuels Inc. (UUUU) has a higher volatility of 27.22% compared to Mkango Resources Ltd (MKA.L) at 22.41%. This indicates that UUUU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MKA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UUUUMKA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

27.22%

22.41%

+4.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

67.09%

48.66%

+18.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

95.70%

94.99%

+0.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

73.40%

77.90%

-4.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

72.59%

96.82%

-24.23%

Dividends

UUUU vs. MKA.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither UUUU nor MKA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

UUUU vs. MKA.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Energy Fuels Inc. and Mkango Resources Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00M20.00M30.00M40.00M20222023202420252026
35.84M
50.78K
(UUUU) Total Revenue
(MKA.L) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


UUUU and MKA.L have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UUUU and MKA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer