UUUG vs. QTJL

Last updated Jul 1, 2026

UUUG (Leverage Shares 2X Long UUUU Daily ETF) and QTJL (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July) are both Leveraged Equities funds. UUUG is passively managed, while QTJL is actively managed. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UUUG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for QTJL.

Performance

UUUG vs. QTJL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long UUUU Daily ETF (UUUG) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

UUUG

• 1D: -0.77%
• 1M: -41.66%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QTJL

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.39%
• YTD: 7.53%
• 6M: 7.34%
• 1Y: 18.18%
• 3Y*: 19.06%
• 5Y*: 10.52%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UUUG vs. QTJL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
UUUG Leverage Shares 2X Long UUUU Daily ETF	-66.05%
QTJL Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July	6.41%

Correlation

The correlation between UUUG and QTJL is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2026	0.49

Return for Risk

UUUG vs. QTJL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UUUG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

QTJL

QTJL Risk / Return Rank: 72
QTJL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
QTJL Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
QTJL Omega Ratio Rank: 76
QTJL Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
QTJL Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UUUG vs. QTJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long UUUU Daily ETF (UUUG) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	UUUG	QTJL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.85	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.65	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.38	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.73	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	14.40	—

Drawdowns

UUUG vs. QTJL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UUUG drawdown since its inception was -83.65%, which is greater than QTJL's maximum drawdown of -33.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UUUG and QTJL.

Drawdown Indicators

	UUUG	QTJL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-83.65%	-33.40%	-50.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-6.68%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-22.43%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-33.40%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-82.15%	0.00%	-82.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-55.36%	-7.82%	-47.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.27%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	UUUG	QTJL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.58%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	7.36%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	185.95%	9.86%	+176.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	185.95%	20.27%	+165.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	185.95%	20.27%	+165.68%

UUUG vs. QTJL - Expense Ratio Comparison

UUUG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than QTJL's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

UUUG vs. QTJL - Dividend Comparison

Neither UUUG nor QTJL has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UUUG and QTJL in my portfolio?

UUUG and QTJL have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, UUUG or QTJL?

On fees, UUUG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, UUUG or QTJL?

UUUG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for QTJL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, UUUG or QTJL?

UUUG and QTJL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between UUUG and QTJL?

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for UUUG and 0.79% for QTJL.