UUUG vs. CIFU

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

UUUG (Leverage Shares 2X Long UUUU Daily ETF) and CIFU (T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. UUUG is passively managed, while CIFU is actively managed. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. UUUG charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for CIFU.

Performance

UUUG vs. CIFU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long UUUU Daily ETF (UUUG) and T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF (CIFU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

UUUG

• 1D: 22.60%
• 1M: -24.43%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CIFU

• 1D: 17.92%
• 1M: 113.70%
• YTD: 89.23%
• 6M: 21.01%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UUUG vs. CIFU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
UUUG Leverage Shares 2X Long UUUU Daily ETF	-32.56%
CIFU T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF	29.51%

Correlation

The correlation between UUUG and CIFU is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2026	0.56

Return for Risk

UUUG vs. CIFU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long UUUU Daily ETF (UUUG) and T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF (CIFU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	UUUG	CIFU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.34	0.98	-1.32

Drawdowns

UUUG vs. CIFU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UUUG drawdown since its inception was -75.51%, roughly equal to the maximum CIFU drawdown of -77.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UUUG and CIFU.

Drawdown Indicators

	UUUG	CIFU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-75.51%	-77.20%	+1.69%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-65.23%	-9.89%	-55.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-51.13%	-45.63%	-5.50%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	UUUG	CIFU	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	190.35%	206.99%	-16.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	190.35%	206.99%	-16.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	190.35%	206.99%	-16.64%

UUUG vs. CIFU - Expense Ratio Comparison

UUUG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than CIFU's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

UUUG vs. CIFU - Dividend Comparison

Neither UUUG nor CIFU has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UUUG and CIFU in my portfolio?

UUUG and CIFU have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, UUUG or CIFU?

On fees, UUUG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, UUUG or CIFU?

UUUG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for CIFU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, UUUG or CIFU?

UUUG and CIFU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between UUUG and CIFU?

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for UUUG and 1.50% for CIFU.