UUUG vs. CIFU
UUUG (Leverage Shares 2X Long UUUU Daily ETF) and CIFU (T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. UUUG is passively managed, while CIFU is actively managed. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. UUUG charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for CIFU.
Performance
UUUG vs. CIFU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
UUUG
- 1D
- -8.54%
- 1M
- -32.81%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CIFU
- 1D
- -4.06%
- 1M
- 42.63%
- YTD
- 94.41%
- 6M
- 64.26%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UUUG vs. CIFU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
UUUG Leverage Shares 2X Long UUUU Daily ETF | -61.29% |
CIFU T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF | 41.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between UUUG and CIFU is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2026 | 0.59 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UUUG vs. CIFU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long UUUU Daily ETF (UUUG) and T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF (CIFU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UUUG vs. CIFU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UUUG drawdown since its inception was -83.65%, which is greater than CIFU's maximum drawdown of -77.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UUUG and CIFU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UUUG | CIFU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.65% | -77.20% | -6.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -79.65% | -10.48% | -69.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -54.16% | -42.93% | -11.23% |
Volatility
UUUG vs. CIFU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UUUG | CIFU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 189.61% | 207.07% | -17.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 189.61% | 207.07% | -17.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 189.61% | 207.07% | -17.46% |
UUUG vs. CIFU - Expense Ratio Comparison
UUUG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than CIFU's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
UUUG vs. CIFU - Dividend Comparison
Neither UUUG nor CIFU has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
UUUG and CIFU have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, UUUG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UUUG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for CIFU.
UUUG and CIFU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for UUUG and 1.50% for CIFU.
Find the right allocation for UUUG and CIFU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer