UTWY vs. CPAG
UTWY (F/m US Treasury 20 Year Bond ETF) and CPAG (F/m Compoundr U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UTWY is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Treasury Bellwether 20 Year Index, while CPAG is a Total Bond Market fund tracking the Nasdaq Compoundr U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. Both are passively managed. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. UTWY charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.31%/yr for CPAG.
Performance
UTWY vs. CPAG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UTWY achieves a -0.64% return, which is significantly lower than CPAG's -0.02% return.
UTWY
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- 0.54%
- YTD
- -0.64%
- 6M
- -1.78%
- 1Y
- 4.46%
- 3Y*
- -0.54%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CPAG
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 0.14%
- YTD
- -0.02%
- 6M
- -0.26%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UTWY vs. CPAG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
UTWY F/m US Treasury 20 Year Bond ETF | -0.64% | 2.40% |
CPAG F/m Compoundr U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | -0.02% | 2.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between UTWY and CPAG is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 13, 2025 | 0.95 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UTWY vs. CPAG — Risk / Return Rank
UTWY
CPAG
UTWY vs. CPAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for F/m US Treasury 20 Year Bond ETF (UTWY) and F/m Compoundr U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (CPAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UTWY | CPAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.55 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.85 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.67 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.81 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UTWY | CPAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.08 | 0.75 | -0.83 |
Drawdowns
UTWY vs. CPAG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UTWY drawdown since its inception was -18.19%, which is greater than CPAG's maximum drawdown of -2.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTWY and CPAG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UTWY | CPAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.19% | -2.78% | -15.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.70% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.98% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.03% | -1.68% | -4.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.03% | -0.74% | -6.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.47% | — | — |
Volatility
UTWY vs. CPAG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UTWY | CPAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.50% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.64% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.10% | 3.67% | +4.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.11% | 3.67% | +7.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.11% | 3.67% | +7.44% |
UTWY vs. CPAG - Expense Ratio Comparison
UTWY has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than CPAG's 0.31% expense ratio.
Dividends
UTWY vs. CPAG - Dividend Comparison
UTWY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.69%, while CPAG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CPAG F/m Compoundr U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UTWY F/m US Treasury 20 Year Bond ETF | 4.69% | 4.62% | 4.56% | 2.94% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, UTWY and CPAG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, UTWY is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UTWY is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.31% for CPAG.
UTWY has the higher dividend yield at 4.69%, compared with 0.00% for CPAG.
UTWY is categorized as Government Bonds, while CPAG is Total Bond Market. UTWY tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Bellwether 20 Year Index, while CPAG tracks Nasdaq Compoundr U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for UTWY and 0.31% for CPAG.
Find the right allocation for UTWY and CPAG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer