PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UTWY vs. CPAG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UTWY vs. CPAG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in F/m US Treasury 20 Year Bond ETF (UTWY) and F/m Compoundr U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (CPAG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UTWY achieves a -0.64% return, which is significantly lower than CPAG's -0.02% return.


UTWY

1D
-0.35%
1M
0.54%
YTD
-0.64%
6M
-1.78%
1Y
4.46%
3Y*
-0.54%
5Y*
10Y*

CPAG

1D
-0.21%
1M
0.14%
YTD
-0.02%
6M
-0.26%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UTWY vs. CPAG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between UTWY and CPAG is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 13, 2025

0.95

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UTWY vs. CPAG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UTWY
UTWY Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
UTWY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UTWY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
UTWY Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
UTWY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
UTWY Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

CPAG
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UTWY vs. CPAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for F/m US Treasury 20 Year Bond ETF (UTWY) and F/m Compoundr U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (CPAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UTWYCPAGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.55

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.85

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.67

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.81

UTWY vs. CPAG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UTWYCPAGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.08

0.75

-0.83

Drawdowns

UTWY vs. CPAG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UTWY drawdown since its inception was -18.19%, which is greater than CPAG's maximum drawdown of -2.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTWY and CPAG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UTWYCPAGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.19%

-2.78%

-15.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.03%

-1.68%

-4.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.03%

-0.74%

-6.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.47%

Volatility

UTWY vs. CPAG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UTWYCPAGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.10%

3.67%

+4.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.11%

3.67%

+7.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.11%

3.67%

+7.44%

UTWY vs. CPAG - Expense Ratio Comparison

UTWY has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than CPAG's 0.31% expense ratio.


Dividends

UTWY vs. CPAG - Dividend Comparison

UTWY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.69%, while CPAG has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
CPAG
F/m Compoundr U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UTWY
F/m US Treasury 20 Year Bond ETF
4.69%4.62%4.56%2.94%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, UTWY and CPAG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, UTWY is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UTWY is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.31% for CPAG.

UTWY has the higher dividend yield at 4.69%, compared with 0.00% for CPAG.

UTWY is categorized as Government Bonds, while CPAG is Total Bond Market. UTWY tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Bellwether 20 Year Index, while CPAG tracks Nasdaq Compoundr U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for UTWY and 0.31% for CPAG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UTWY and CPAG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer