PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UTWY vs. TLT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UTWY vs. TLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in F/m US Treasury 20 Year Bond ETF (UTWY) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UTWY achieves a -2.81% return, which is significantly higher than TLT's -3.18% return.


UTWY

1D
0.43%
1M
-2.81%
6M
-2.47%
YTD
-2.81%
1Y
-1.24%
3Y*
0.01%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-1.50%

TLT

1D
0.33%
1M
-3.49%
6M
-2.86%
YTD
-3.18%
1Y
-2.12%
3Y*
-1.15%
5Y*
-8.33%
10Y*
-2.33%
ALL TIME*
3.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.39B$2.06B$2.20B
$116.12K$62.48K$64.76K

UTWY vs. TLT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
UTWY
F/m US Treasury 20 Year Bond ETF
-2.81%4.82%-4.92%-1.86%
TLT
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF
-3.18%4.25%-8.05%-2.43%

Correlation

The correlation between UTWY and TLT is 0.99 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2023

0.98

The correlation between UTWY and TLT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UTWY vs. TLT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

UTWY
UTWY Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
UTWY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UTWY Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
UTWY Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
UTWY Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
UTWY Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

TLT
TLT Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
TLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLT Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
TLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLT Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

UTWY vs. TLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for F/m US Treasury 20 Year Bond ETF (UTWY) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UTWYTLTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

0.97

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.18

-0.28

+0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.41

-0.59

+0.18

UTWY vs. TLT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UTWY Sharpe Ratio is -0.16, which is higher than the TLT Sharpe Ratio of -0.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UTWY and TLT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UTWY vs. TLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UTWY drawdown since its inception was -18.19%, smaller than the maximum TLT drawdown of -48.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTWY and TLT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UTWYTLTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.19%

-48.35%

+30.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.72%

-7.74%

+1.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.88%

-14.79%

+2.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.08%

-42.17%

+34.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.98%

-14.00%

+7.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.03%

3.60%

-0.57%

Volatility

UTWY vs. TLT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for F/m US Treasury 20 Year Bond ETF (UTWY) is 2.16%, while iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) has a volatility of 2.51%. This indicates that UTWY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UTWYTLTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.16%

2.51%

-0.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.02%

6.84%

-0.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.74%

9.24%

-1.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.97%

15.74%

-4.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.97%

14.83%

-3.86%

UTWY vs. TLT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both UTWY and TLT have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

UTWY vs. TLT - Dividend Comparison

UTWY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.83%, more than TLT's 4.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TLT
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF
4.75%4.43%4.30%3.38%2.67%1.50%1.50%2.27%2.63%2.43%2.60%2.61%
UTWY
F/m US Treasury 20 Year Bond ETF
4.83%4.62%4.56%2.94%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, UTWY and TLT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TLT has higher volatility (2.51%) compared to UTWY (2.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UTWY dropped -18.19% vs TLT's -48.35%.

On 3-year performance, UTWY leads with 0.01% vs -1.15% for TLT. Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. On volatility, UTWY has been the lower-risk option at 2.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, UTWY has performed better with a 0.01% return vs -1.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

UTWY and TLT have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

UTWY has the higher dividend yield at 4.83%, compared with 4.75% for TLT.

UTWY tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Bellwether 20 Year Index, while TLT tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: F/m and iShares.

UTWY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.16 vs -0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UTWY and TLT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer