UTWO vs. SCHQ
UTWO (US Treasury 2 Year Note ETF) and SCHQ (Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF) are both Government Bonds funds - UTWO tracks the ICE BofA Current 2 Year US Treasury Index - Benchmark TR Gross while SCHQ tracks the Bloomberg U.S. Long Treasury Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, UTWO returned 3.92%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for SCHQ. Their 0.63 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. UTWO charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHQ.
Performance
UTWO vs. SCHQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UTWO achieves a 0.78% return, which is significantly higher than SCHQ's -2.16% return.
UTWO
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 0.18%
- 6M
- 0.66%
- YTD
- 0.78%
- 1Y
- 2.51%
- 3Y*
- 3.92%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 2.96%
SCHQ
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- -2.42%
- 6M
- -2.00%
- YTD
- -2.16%
- 1Y
- -0.79%
- 3Y*
- 0.22%
- 5Y*
- -6.96%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -4.02%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $14.32M | $14.68M | $18.61M | |
| $4.51M | $4.39M | $4.62M |
UTWO vs. SCHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UTWO US Treasury 2 Year Note ETF | 0.78% | 4.79% | 3.71% | 3.45% | -0.84% |
SCHQ Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF | -2.16% | 5.50% | -6.44% | 3.43% | -13.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between UTWO and SCHQ is 0.64, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 9, 2022 | 0.63 |
The correlation between UTWO and SCHQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UTWO vs. SCHQ — Risk / Return Rank
UTWO
SCHQ
UTWO vs. SCHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for US Treasury 2 Year Note ETF (UTWO) and Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UTWO | SCHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 0.99 | +0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.80 | -0.11 | +2.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.69 | -0.24 | +9.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UTWO vs. SCHQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UTWO drawdown since its inception was -2.04%, smaller than the maximum SCHQ drawdown of -46.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTWO and SCHQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UTWO | SCHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.04% | -46.13% | +44.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.90% | -7.05% | +6.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.08% | -13.38% | +12.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -40.93% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -37.91% | +37.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.47% | -26.61% | +26.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.26% | 3.25% | -2.99% |
Volatility
UTWO vs. SCHQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for US Treasury 2 Year Note ETF (UTWO) is 0.40%, while Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHQ) has a volatility of 2.47%. This indicates that UTWO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UTWO | SCHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.40% | 2.47% | -2.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.07% | 6.34% | -5.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.28% | 8.43% | -7.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.05% | 14.42% | -12.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.05% | 15.20% | -13.15% |
UTWO vs. SCHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
UTWO has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHQ's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
UTWO vs. SCHQ - Dividend Comparison
UTWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.53%, less than SCHQ's 4.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHQ Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF | 4.89% | 4.54% | 4.58% | 3.79% | 2.88% | 1.69% | 1.51% | 0.44% |
UTWO US Treasury 2 Year Note ETF | 3.53% | 3.63% | 4.22% | 4.39% | 1.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UTWO and SCHQ have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHQ has higher volatility (2.47%) compared to UTWO (0.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UTWO dropped -2.04% vs SCHQ's -46.13%.
On 3-year performance, UTWO leads with 3.92% vs 0.22% for SCHQ. On fees, SCHQ is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, UTWO has been the lower-risk option at 0.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, UTWO has performed better with a 3.92% return vs 0.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHQ is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for UTWO.
SCHQ has the higher dividend yield at 4.89%, compared with 3.53% for UTWO.
UTWO tracks ICE BofA Current 2 Year US Treasury Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while SCHQ tracks Bloomberg U.S. Long Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: US Benchmark Series and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for UTWO and 0.03% for SCHQ.
UTWO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs -0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UTWO and SCHQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer