SCHQ vs. SPTL
Compare and contrast key facts about Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHQ) and SPDR Portfolio Long Term Treasury ETF (SPTL).
SCHQ and SPTL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SCHQ is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Aggregate Government - Treasury - Long. It was launched on Oct 10, 2019. SPTL is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Aggregate Government - Treasury - Long. It was launched on May 23, 2007. Both SCHQ and SPTL are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SCHQ or SPTL.
Key characteristics
| SCHQ | SPTL | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 0.24% | 0.27% |
| 1Y Return | 16.52% | 16.54% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -9.28% | -9.32% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | -4.37% | -4.39% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.08 | 1.08 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.61 | 1.60 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.18 | 1.19 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.33 | 0.33 |
| Martin Ratio | 3.13 | 3.11 |
| Ulcer Index | 4.86% | 4.90% |
| Daily Std Dev | 14.11% | 14.10% |
| Max Drawdown | -46.13% | -46.20% |
| Current Drawdown | -35.56% | -35.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHQ and SPTL is 1.00, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
SCHQ vs. SPTL - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, SCHQ achieves a 0.24% return, which is significantly lower than SPTL's 0.27% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SCHQ vs. SPTL - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHQ has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than SPTL's 0.06% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SCHQ vs. SPTL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHQ) and SPDR Portfolio Long Term Treasury ETF (SPTL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SCHQ vs. SPTL - Dividend Comparison
SCHQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.17%, more than SPTL's 3.67% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHQ Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF | 4.17% | 3.79% | 2.88% | 1.69% | 1.52% | 0.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPTL SPDR Portfolio Long Term Treasury ETF | 3.67% | 3.24% | 2.75% | 1.68% | 1.71% | 2.45% | 2.69% | 2.53% | 2.56% | 2.60% | 2.63% | 2.98% |
Drawdowns
SCHQ vs. SPTL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHQ drawdown since its inception was -46.13%, roughly equal to the maximum SPTL drawdown of -46.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHQ and SPTL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SCHQ vs. SPTL - Volatility Comparison
Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHQ) and SPDR Portfolio Long Term Treasury ETF (SPTL) have volatilities of 2.80% and 2.70%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.