UTWO vs. GBIL
Compare and contrast key facts about US Treasury 2 Year Note ETF (UTWO) and Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF (GBIL).
UTWO and GBIL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. UTWO is a passively managed fund by US Benchmark Series that tracks the performance of the ICE BofA Current 2 Year US Treasury Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Aug 8, 2022. GBIL is a passively managed fund by Goldman Sachs that tracks the performance of the FTSE US Treasury 0-1 Year Composite Select Index. It was launched on Sep 6, 2016. Both UTWO and GBIL are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
UTWO vs. GBIL - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
UTWO vs. GBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UTWO US Treasury 2 Year Note ETF | 0.25% | 4.79% | 3.71% | 3.45% | -0.81% |
GBIL Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF | 0.80% | 4.12% | 5.24% | 4.91% | 1.07% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UTWO achieves a 0.25% return, which is significantly lower than GBIL's 0.80% return.
UTWO
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -0.46%
- YTD
- 0.25%
- 6M
- 1.36%
- 1Y
- 3.47%
- 3Y*
- 3.60%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GBIL
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- YTD
- 0.80%
- 6M
- 1.83%
- 1Y
- 3.99%
- 3Y*
- 4.66%
- 5Y*
- 3.19%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
UTWO vs. GBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
UTWO has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than GBIL's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
UTWO vs. GBIL — Risk / Return Rank
UTWO
GBIL
UTWO vs. GBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for US Treasury 2 Year Note ETF (UTWO) and Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF (GBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UTWO | GBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.31 | 16.02 | -13.70 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.69 | 81.72 | -78.04 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 24.01 | -22.53 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.92 | 199.80 | -195.88 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.93 | 1,295.81 | -1,281.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UTWO | GBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.31 | 16.02 | -13.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 5.54 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.49 | 4.79 | -3.30 |
Correlation
The correlation between UTWO and GBIL is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
UTWO vs. GBIL - Dividend Comparison
UTWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.81%, less than GBIL's 3.89% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UTWO US Treasury 2 Year Note ETF | 3.48% | 3.63% | 4.22% | 4.39% | 1.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GBIL Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF | 3.55% | 4.02% | 4.93% | 4.77% | 1.37% | 0.00% | 0.81% | 2.20% | 1.70% | 0.74% | 0.11% |
Drawdowns
UTWO vs. GBIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UTWO drawdown since its inception was -2.04%, which is greater than GBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTWO and GBIL.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| UTWO | GBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.04% | -0.76% | -1.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.90% | -0.02% | -0.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -0.76% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.46% | 0.00% | -0.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.49% | -0.04% | -0.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.25% | 0.00% | +0.25% |
Volatility
UTWO vs. GBIL - Volatility Comparison
US Treasury 2 Year Note ETF (UTWO) has a higher volatility of 0.54% compared to Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF (GBIL) at 0.08%. This indicates that UTWO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| UTWO | GBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.54% | 0.08% | +0.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.86% | 0.15% | +0.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.51% | 0.25% | +1.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.10% | 0.58% | +1.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.10% | 0.47% | +1.63% |