UTWO vs. FAAR
UTWO (US Treasury 2 Year Note ETF) and FAAR (First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UTWO is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofA Current 2 Year US Treasury Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while FAAR is a Commodities fund actively managed by First Trust. UTWO is passively managed, while FAAR is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, UTWO returned 3.89%/yr vs 10.03%/yr for FAAR. At a correlation of -0.11, they often move in opposite directions. UTWO charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for FAAR.
Performance
UTWO vs. FAAR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UTWO achieves a 0.44% return, which is significantly lower than FAAR's 17.40% return.
UTWO
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 0.44%
- 6M
- 0.57%
- 1Y
- 2.74%
- 3Y*
- 3.89%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FAAR
- 1D
- -1.46%
- 1M
- -6.59%
- YTD
- 17.40%
- 6M
- 17.10%
- 1Y
- 28.26%
- 3Y*
- 10.03%
- 5Y*
- 7.50%
- 10Y*
- 4.54%
UTWO vs. FAAR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UTWO US Treasury 2 Year Note ETF | 0.44% | 4.79% | 3.71% | 3.45% | -0.84% |
FAAR First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF | 17.40% | 8.07% | 5.97% | -5.63% | -1.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between UTWO and FAAR is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 9, 2022 | -0.11 |
The correlation between UTWO and FAAR shifts across timeframes, from -0.23 (1 year) to -0.11 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UTWO vs. FAAR — Risk / Return Rank
UTWO
FAAR
UTWO vs. FAAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for US Treasury 2 Year Note ETF (UTWO) and First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UTWO | FAAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.37 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.06 | 3.71 | -0.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.66 | 14.66 | -4.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UTWO vs. FAAR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UTWO drawdown since its inception was -2.04%, smaller than the maximum FAAR drawdown of -18.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTWO and FAAR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UTWO | FAAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.04% | -18.03% | +15.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.90% | -7.66% | +6.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.08% | -11.54% | +10.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -18.03% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.27% | -7.66% | +7.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.48% | -7.82% | +7.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.26% | 1.93% | -1.67% |
Volatility
UTWO vs. FAAR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for US Treasury 2 Year Note ETF (UTWO) is 0.49%, while First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR) has a volatility of 2.82%. This indicates that UTWO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FAAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UTWO | FAAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.49% | 2.82% | -2.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.01% | 9.80% | -8.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.37% | 13.30% | -11.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.07% | 12.97% | -10.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.07% | 11.55% | -9.48% |
UTWO vs. FAAR - Expense Ratio Comparison
UTWO has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than FAAR's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
UTWO vs. FAAR - Dividend Comparison
UTWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%, less than FAAR's 9.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAAR First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF | 9.80% | 11.63% | 3.45% | 3.20% | 5.82% | 6.49% | 3.05% | 1.02% | 0.58% | 2.83% |
UTWO US Treasury 2 Year Note ETF | 3.49% | 3.63% | 4.22% | 4.39% | 1.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UTWO and FAAR have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FAAR has higher volatility (2.82%) compared to UTWO (0.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UTWO dropped -2.04% vs FAAR's -18.03%.
On 3-year performance, FAAR leads with 10.03% vs 3.89% for UTWO. On fees, UTWO is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, UTWO has been the lower-risk option at 0.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, FAAR has performed better with a 10.03% return vs 3.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
UTWO is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FAAR.
FAAR has the higher dividend yield at 9.80%, compared with 3.49% for UTWO.
UTWO is categorized as Government Bonds, while FAAR is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: US Benchmark Series and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for UTWO and 0.95% for FAAR.
FAAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UTWO and FAAR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer