UTSL vs. BNKU
UTSL (Direxion Daily Utilities Bull 3X Shares) and BNKU (MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index 3X Leveraged ETNs) are both Leveraged Equities funds - UTSL tracks the Utilities Select Sector Index (300%) while BNKU tracks the Solactive MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index (-300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, UTSL returned 18.04% vs 111.56% for BNKU. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UTSL charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BNKU.
Performance
UTSL vs. BNKU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UTSL achieves a 6.35% return, which is significantly lower than BNKU's 14.86% return.
UTSL
- 1D
- 3.20%
- 1M
- -2.77%
- YTD
- 6.35%
- 6M
- 6.90%
- 1Y
- 18.04%
- 3Y*
- 20.77%
- 5Y*
- 8.66%
- 10Y*
- —
BNKU
- 1D
- 5.30%
- 1M
- 29.28%
- YTD
- 14.86%
- 6M
- 15.82%
- 1Y
- 111.56%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UTSL vs. BNKU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
UTSL Direxion Daily Utilities Bull 3X Shares | 6.35% | 11.80% |
BNKU MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index 3X Leveraged ETNs | 14.86% | 34.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between UTSL and BNKU is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025 | 0.20 |
UTSL vs. BNKU - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
UTSL
BNKU
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
UTSL
BNKU
-
Basic Materials
UTSL
-
BNKU
-
Communication Services
UTSL
-
BNKU
-
Consumer Cyclical
UTSL
-
BNKU
-
Consumer Defensive
UTSL
-
BNKU
-
Energy
UTSL
-
BNKU
-
Financial Services
UTSL
-
BNKU
Healthcare
UTSL
-
BNKU
-
Industrials
UTSL
-
BNKU
-
Real Estate
UTSL
-
BNKU
-
Technology
UTSL
-
BNKU
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UTSL vs. BNKU — Risk / Return Rank
UTSL
BNKU
UTSL vs. BNKU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Utilities Bull 3X Shares (UTSL) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index 3X Leveraged ETNs (BNKU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UTSL | BNKU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.30 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.64 | 2.74 | -2.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.30 | 7.20 | -5.90 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UTSL vs. BNKU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UTSL drawdown since its inception was -79.55%, which is greater than BNKU's maximum drawdown of -61.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTSL and BNKU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UTSL | BNKU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.55% | -61.21% | -18.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.45% | -40.97% | +12.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -46.22% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -68.01% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.69% | -2.63% | -19.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.19% | -18.05% | -15.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.87% | 15.55% | -1.68% |
Volatility
UTSL vs. BNKU - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily Utilities Bull 3X Shares (UTSL) has a higher volatility of 17.03% compared to MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index 3X Leveraged ETNs (BNKU) at 15.55%. This indicates that UTSL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BNKU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UTSL | BNKU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.03% | 15.55% | +1.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.33% | 45.72% | -10.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.73% | 57.72% | -13.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 52.08% | 73.10% | -21.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 59.23% | 73.10% | -13.87% |
UTSL vs. BNKU - Expense Ratio Comparison
UTSL has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than BNKU's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
UTSL vs. BNKU - Dividend Comparison
UTSL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.71%, while BNKU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BNKU MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index 3X Leveraged ETNs | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UTSL Direxion Daily Utilities Bull 3X Shares | 1.71% | 1.69% | 1.61% | 3.61% | 1.15% | 1.19% | 1.40% | 5.01% | 1.46% | 0.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UTSL and BNKU have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UTSL has higher volatility (17.03%) compared to BNKU (15.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UTSL dropped -79.55% vs BNKU's -61.21%.
On 1-year performance, BNKU leads with 111.56% vs 18.04% for UTSL. On fees, BNKU is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, BNKU has been the lower-risk option at 15.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BNKU has performed better with a 111.56% return vs 18.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BNKU is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for UTSL.
UTSL has the higher dividend yield at 1.71%, compared with 0.00% for BNKU.
UTSL tracks Utilities Select Sector Index (300%), while BNKU tracks Solactive MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index (-300%). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Bank of Montreal. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for UTSL and 0.95% for BNKU.
BNKU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UTSL and BNKU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer