PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UTRN vs. PSCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UTRN vs. PSCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vesper U.S. Large Cap Short-Term Reversal Strategy ETF (UTRN) and Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


UTRN

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PSCX

1D
-0.12%
1M
2.00%
YTD
5.11%
6M
5.98%
1Y
15.49%
3Y*
12.85%
5Y*
8.46%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UTRN vs. PSCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
UTRN
Vesper U.S. Large Cap Short-Term Reversal Strategy ETF
0.00%-3.65%28.82%0.72%-20.36%30.54%1.88%
PSCX
Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF
5.11%12.08%13.27%16.57%-7.35%9.03%0.81%

Correlation

The correlation between UTRN and PSCX is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 24, 2020

0.56

The correlation between UTRN and PSCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (3 years) to 0.56 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

UTRN vs. PSCX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
UTRN
PSCX

Financial Services

36.4%
12.5%

Technology

31.9%
33.2%

Communication Services

8.0%
10.3%

Basic Materials

7.9%
1.9%

Energy

4.1%
4.2%

Industrials

4.0%
8.4%

Consumer Cyclical

3.9%
10.0%

Healthcare

3.8%
9.6%

Consumer Defensive

-

5.4%

Real Estate

-

2.0%

Utilities

-

2.6%

Financial Services

UTRN
36.4%
PSCX
12.5%

Technology

UTRN
31.9%
PSCX
33.2%

Communication Services

UTRN
8.0%
PSCX
10.3%

Basic Materials

UTRN
7.9%
PSCX
1.9%

Energy

UTRN
4.1%
PSCX
4.2%

Industrials

UTRN
4.0%
PSCX
8.4%

Consumer Cyclical

UTRN
3.9%
PSCX
10.0%

Healthcare

UTRN
3.8%
PSCX
9.6%

Consumer Defensive

UTRN

-

PSCX
5.4%

Real Estate

UTRN

-

PSCX
2.0%

Utilities

UTRN

-

PSCX
2.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UTRN vs. PSCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UTRN

PSCX
PSCX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
PSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
PSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UTRN vs. PSCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vesper U.S. Large Cap Short-Term Reversal Strategy ETF (UTRN) and Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

UTRN vs. PSCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UTRNPSCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.82

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.27

Drawdowns

UTRN vs. PSCX - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UTRNPSCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.82%

Volatility

UTRN vs. PSCX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UTRNPSCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.96%

UTRN vs. PSCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both UTRN and PSCX have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

UTRN vs. PSCX - Dividend Comparison

Neither UTRN nor PSCX has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
PSCX
Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UTRN
Vesper U.S. Large Cap Short-Term Reversal Strategy ETF
0.00%0.00%1.06%2.75%1.09%24.51%9.09%3.77%0.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


UTRN and PSCX have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UTRN and PSCX have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

UTRN and PSCX have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Pacer.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UTRN and PSCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer