PortfoliosLab logo
UTRN vs. BDGS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between UTRN and BDGS is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

UTRN vs. BDGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vesper U.S. Large Cap Short-Term Reversal Strategy ETF (UTRN) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Returns By Period


UTRN

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

3Y*

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

BDGS

YTD

2.08%

1M

1.96%

6M

2.66%

1Y

16.98%

3Y*

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


UTRN vs. BDGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

UTRN has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than BDGS's 0.85% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

UTRN vs. BDGS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UTRN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of UTRN is 7272
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of UTRN is 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of UTRN is 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of UTRN is 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of UTRN is 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of UTRN is 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

BDGS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BDGS is 9191
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BDGS is 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BDGS is 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BDGS is 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BDGS is 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BDGS is 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

UTRN vs. BDGS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vesper U.S. Large Cap Short-Term Reversal Strategy ETF (UTRN) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

UTRN vs. BDGS - Dividend Comparison

UTRN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BDGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%.


TTM2024202320222021202020192018
UTRN
Vesper U.S. Large Cap Short-Term Reversal Strategy ETF
1.10%1.06%2.75%1.09%1.05%1.09%0.63%0.71%
BDGS
Bridges Capital Tactical ETF
1.77%1.81%0.84%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

UTRN vs. BDGS - Drawdown Comparison


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

UTRN vs. BDGS - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...